My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-74 Budget SC Report 18Nov14
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Pre-2018 Files
>
Communications to AC
>
2014
>
2014-74 Budget SC Report 18Nov14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2014 1:48:53 PM
Creation date
11/14/2014 2:01:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Communication No. 2014-74 <br /> PCDP Budget Subcommittee Report <br /> Meeting held October 15th then Subcommittee continued discussions via email <br /> PCDP Budget Subcommittee in Attendance: Susan Osborne, Oshi Simsarian, Elmer Solis, Farris Etterlee <br /> (Chair) <br /> Planning Department Staff: Larry Brown - PCDP Project Manager, Keiko Mercado- PCDP Planning <br /> Assistant, <br /> Report: <br /> 2014 Budget Subcommittee goal is to champion past approved PCDP Budgeted items to bring attention <br /> to the budgeted items with the ultimate goal of getting funding to start the project. <br /> The Budget Subcommittee reviewed all prior year(s) "approved" budgeted items that relate to the <br /> PUNA area. <br /> The following steps were used to get the projects organized: <br /> Step 1: Puna/PCDP budgeted items were then put into four categories: <br /> Long Range Safety Connectivity Recreation <br /> Step 2: Within each category, each project was considered and a priority number was assigned. <br /> Step 3:The Subcommittee rationale for each priority is given in the Rationale Column <br /> Step 4: The Subcommittee came up with set of common questions that were then assigned to each <br /> project if the question(s) applied. The list of questions is as follows: <br /> 1. To gain further understanding of where the project stands and if monies have been spent. If <br /> funds have been spent, what has been completed and what remains to be done. <br /> 2. If several budget items seem to be related - either from prior years and/or by descriptions, to <br /> clarify if the projects are related and why they are listed twice. <br /> 3. To gain insight from the Department Director of how they prioritize the budgeted item. <br /> 4. For Projects that have phases (for example Issac Hale Beach Park Expansion) were all funds <br /> allocated and can other related projects be incorporated into the current funding (for example <br /> Pohoiki Swimming Area Study/Planning). <br /> 5. What are Department Priorities and how can PCDP help Departments in backing their <br /> priorities. <br /> New Budgeted Tasks: <br /> 1. Budget request for PCDP Planning Assistant-General Fund <br /> 3. Subcommittees to submit CIP/General budget request to PCDP Budget Subcommittee members by <br /> Nov 3rd. Subcommittees to be contacted by Keiko to be determined if they have additional requests. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.