My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-21 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2014
>
2014-10-21 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2014 4:08:39 PM
Creation date
11/19/2014 4:08:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Childs noted, however, that the proposal was based upon the property’s sub-standard parking lot <br />configuration, and, furthermore, the proposed project would reduce the number of parking spaces <br />currently provided. He said that the Planning Department would be able to assess the parking <br />situation when the required application for Plan Approval was submitted. <br /> <br />The applicant’s representative, Stone Wolfsong, stated that Full Life is a nonprofit organization, <br />which services people with disabilities, and that they wished to set an example to the community. <br />She spoke of the project’s visual impact, which she said would be minimal. In response to the <br />commissioners’ questions, she said that the applicant was hoping to get a secondhand wheelchair lift, <br />and, as such, she was not sure of the color at the moment. <br /> <br />It was moved by Commissioner Hetherington and seconded by Commissioner Andreae that the <br />Commission recommend the Planning Director’s approval of the proposed project as submitted. <br />A roll call vote was taken and the motion passed with six ayes (Hetherington, Andreae, Akina, <br />Dahlberg, Stanbro and Sullenberger) and two absent and excused (Au Hoy and Broderson). <br /> <br />2. Review of a revised design proposal for a new three-story commercial-residential building <br />on Walua Road. Applicant: Winton Nicholson, Nicholson LLC. Landowner: Ohia Lani, <br />LLC. TMK: 7-5-018:097. Address: 75-5915 Walua Road. Fronting both Kuakini Highway <br />and Walua Road. <br /> <br />As background information, Mr. Childs went over the applicant’s initial proposal, which had been <br />reviewed by the Commission on July 22, 2014, and the recommendations that the Commission had <br />made at that time. Copies of the minutes were also distributed. Mr. Childs then described the revised <br />design featuring hip roofs of composition shingles, board and batten siding on the third level, more <br />windows, trellises, a large display window and wood railings. He noted that most of the design <br />elements requested by the Commission were incorporated. With respect to the landscaping plan, he <br />said that the proposal included frontage landscaping along both Walua Road and Kuakini Highway, <br />and that it appeared to comply with the Planning Department’s landscaping rule. He concluded by <br />commending the applicant for reaching the basic principles of the Master Plan. <br /> <br />The applicant, Winton Nicholson, circulated paint color chips for clarification, and said that the <br />proposed colors were from the Benjamin Moore historical color scheme. Regarding a canoe on the <br />mauka exterior wall as shown on the drawing, he explained that the owner had a weathered canoe, <br />which could be suspended from the eaves as a decoration; however, that might attract birds to nest <br />there, so they were considering Hawaiian motif carving as an alternative. He also mentioned that he <br />was aware that the proposed lighting fixture Option B would not be approved because there was no <br />vertical shield to generate downcast light as required. Commissioners Hetherington and Akina both <br />expressed their preference for Option A. <br /> <br />Commissioners Sullenberger and Stanbro noted that the windows on mauka wall of the third floor, <br />which is the residential floor, seemed inadequate for taking advantage of a view of the mountain and <br />of mauka breeze, as well as for providing design articulation to the wall. Commissioner Hetherington <br />commented that from his work experience he knew that there would not be much of a view because <br />of the eight-foot berm on Kuakini Highway in addition to the elevation drop of the subject property. <br />Chair Bleck also commented from his experience that those windows on the Kuakini Highway side <br />would more than likely be kept shut because of the traffic noise. Mr. Nicholson responded by saying <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.