My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
AC Minutes 14Oct2014
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Action Committees (AC)
>
Puna Community Development Plan Action Committee
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
AC Minutes 14Oct2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2014 4:04:33 PM
Creation date
11/24/2014 4:02:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
commercial development and an increased demand on the existing inadequate infrastructure. <br /> The water well that was completed approximately a year ago may go on line this year. The <br /> next meeting is Thursday,November 13th at 6pm at the Mt. View School cafeteria. <br /> 7. Communication No. 2014-71 —Volcano Long Range Plan: The PCDP AC considered the <br /> draft letter submitted by Sharon on behalf of the VLRP Subcommittee transmitting the Volcano <br /> Long Range Plan—July 2014 to the Planning Director. <br /> Leila moved to accept Communication No. 2014-71. Second by Rene. <br /> Sharon clarified that this letter is to accompany the VLRP to the Planning Director. <br /> Rene moved to amend the first sentence of the sixth paragraph to read "We believe that our <br /> current......linked with the PCDP and the Hawaii County General Plan. " Second by Patti. <br /> Motion failed with 4 votes aye and S votes nay (Leila, Patti, Elmer, Sharon, June). <br /> Farris moved to amend the letter as follows: Amend the first sentence of the second paragraph <br /> to read "The attached 2014.....Plan (PCDP)". Remove the fourth paragraph completely. <br /> Amend the last sentence of the fifth paragraph to read "As such we believe.....you first whether <br /> the attached VLRP is adoptable in its current form or if a planning consultant is required. " <br /> Second by Susan. Motion failed with 0 votes aye, 8 votes nay and I vote to abstain (Leila). <br /> Oshi moved to amend the letter as follows: Amend the first sentence of the second paragraph <br /> to read "The attached 2014....is a strategic action plan....(PCDP). Remove the fourth <br /> paragraph completely. Second by Farris. The motion passed with 9 votes aye and 0 votes nay. <br /> Leila moved to amend the letter as follows: Switch paragraphs one and two. Add "RE: The <br /> attached Volcano Long Range Plan"above paragraph one. Add "encl: VLRP"at the end of <br /> the letter. Second by Elmer. The motion passed with 9 votes aye and 0 votes nay. <br /> The main motion to accept Communication No. 2014-17 passed with 9 votes aye and 0 votes <br /> nay. <br /> 8. Town Meeting Subcommittee: Members of the Town Meeting Subcommittee reported on <br /> their efforts to gather information from the different Community Associations regarding <br /> Village Center locations and the possible relocation of Pahoa businesses. <br /> Public Testimony: <br /> 1. L.J. Bates, Executive Director of Kalani Honua testified that they are willing and able to <br /> help in any capacity that they can. After Hurricane Iselle, Kalani Honua became a hub <br /> for providing services and supplies and they would like to be able to do that again now. <br /> They are continuing to do business and are working with different vendors to increase <br /> storage and delivery of goods. Kalani Honua has been having great discussions with <br /> Civil Defense and a tower with a Ham Radio is being put in now to increase the ease of <br /> communication. Kalani Honua is 120 acres of Ag zoned land. <br /> The subcommittee reached out to about 20 different Community Associations and at this time <br /> has received little feedback. Leilani Community Association, Hawaiian Shores Community <br /> Association, Koa'e Community Association and Orchidland Community Association are the <br /> four associations who have provided information back to the subcommittee. The overall <br /> feeling is positive with most in favor of the smaller Village Centers and willing to help <br /> however they can but most of the areas do not have the infrastructure in place to accommodate <br /> a Village Center. The subcommittee is continuing to move forward and will present <br /> information as they gather it. The next step is to facilitate a meeting that includes as many <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.