|
<br />APPLICANT’S REPRESENTATIVE AND TESTIFIERS: I do.
<br />
<br />BEAUDET: Thank you. Applicant, if you could introduce yourself.
<br />
<br />FUKE: Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the Commission. My name is Sidney Fuke.
<br />I’m a planning consultant and I’m here assisting the applicant. My business address is 100 Pauahi
<br />Street in Hilo.
<br />
<br />HANLEY: I’m Joe Hanley, owner of Orchid Isle. My address is in Hilo, P. O. Box 4397.
<br />
<br />FUKE: Thank you very much. Mr. Chairman, the applicant has had a chance to review the staff’s
<br />background report and the proposed conditions, and found them to be on point, and all of the
<br />conditions are acceptable.
<br />
<br />I just wanted to give you a little bit of background as far as like how they came across this property.
<br />In the late 60’s, the County had either acquired this property or had this area donated to the County
<br />in anticipation of constructing a fire station, but, because the only fire station existing in Kona way
<br />back in the early 60’s was only down in Kailua. And what happened then was subsequently the
<br />County constructed a new fire station along Palani Road, and then they constructed another one
<br />down in Captain Cook, Kealakekua, and then finally above Keauhou and Pu‘uloa, and then the last
<br />one, of course, in Mākālei. So if you look at the entire stretch of North and South Kona, you pretty
<br />much like have all of the different areas covered. So back in 2007 the County decided that there
<br />was really no need for this particular parcel because as you can see from the photos that the staff has
<br />shown on the board, this is a remnant parcel, and the only access, realistic access, is coming in from
<br />Walua Road after the extension of the Queen Ka‘ahumanu Highway at the Kuakini Highway
<br />intersection. So the County elected to put the property on auction. The adjoining property owner,
<br />which is the applicant, acquired the property in 2007. Since that time over the years what had
<br />happened is that they kind of gradually improved the site. So as you can see from the staff’s photo,
<br />the site is now like a quasi-improved into like a parking area where the applicant currently uses it
<br />for their overflow staff parking, as well as, you know, when they have excess vehicle coming into
<br />the area.
<br />
<br />The staff’s condition, you know, to answer Commissioner Unger’s question, is that some of the
<br />more appurtenant one is that first of all the staff is recommending that the two properties be
<br />consolidated. And the staff (sic) has no objection to that because that is the intent. Because if you
<br />have these two separate parcels being developed separately, then whoever is going to develop the
<br />subject parcel is going to have to sustain a lot of cost because you are going to have to improve and
<br />maintain, not maintain necessarily, but you are going to have to improve Walua Road, and you can
<br />see, you saw the decrepit condition of Walua Road right now. So they require that, you know, the
<br />lots be consolidated into one. Secondly, that they do have to come in for Plan Approval, you know,
<br />to legitimize what they already have right now, and alternatively if there are going to be any other
<br />kind of uses on the property, other than the auto storage or employee parking use, then they are
<br />going to have to come in for Plan Approval.
<br />
<br />I know there have been some concerns, you know, relative to height, you know, and, Director, to
<br />answer your question, the current zoning of the property is Ag-1 and the height limit within the
<br />4
<br />EXHIBIT B
<br />
<br />
|