2014-12-04 Hearing Transcript-Steve Shropshire SMA 14-058

Home

HEAUKULANI: Three. DARROW: Yeah, Condition Three. We’ve, we’ve asked that this condition be in there, that it’s either held back 60 feet or if they submit this report and it’s determined that there is stability and the erosion, the coastal erosion rate is okay to go up to the minimum shoreline setback of 40 feet along a certified shoreline, we can bring it into that 40 feet. But again, in looking at the report, just prematurely, it looks like there may some areas in this that we may want to hold back farther than other areas. So, that’s something that we can work out in the process, but right now, across the board, it’s held back at 60 feet. With this report being submitted and with the approval of the Planning Director, they may be able to come in further to the shoreline up to 40 feet. HEAUKULANI: Thank you. DARROW: Thank you. IKEDA: Question. Are we gonna get a copy of the report because I don’t have it. DARROW: The coastal erosion, the original one was submitted as an Exhibit 10. IKEDA: Right. No, I’ve seen the original, but you said there was a current one that just— DARROW: And then today we— IKEDA: --yes— DARROW: --let me see if I’ve— Is that this one? MOSES: It’s this one— IKEDA: No, no, no, this is— DARROW: Okay— MOSES: This is the one. IKEDA: I was all right with the other one until you mentioned this and wanted this and this. DARROW: There’s, there’s a few adjustments in that. The difference is the date. You’ll see the November versus December, but in talking with the Applicant, there was some minor adjustments in the report, so that’s the only difference. Any other questions? MIYASATO: I have one. Just to be clear, this application is for a Special Management Area Use Permit and not a rezone, Change of Zone. 5 EXHIBIT A