Laserfiche WebLink
<br />These are the reservations that the Planning Director has regarding this bill. The Zoning Code <br />specifies that the purpose of a PUD is to encourage comprehensive site planning that adapts the <br />design of development to the land, by allowing diversification in the relationship of various uses, <br />buildings, structures, open spaces and yards, building heights, and lot sizes in planned building <br />groups, while still ensuring that the intent of this chapter is observed. Emphasis added. <br /> <br />A PUD alone cannot introduce a use that is not permitted within a particular zoning district nor <br />shall its approval compromise the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code. A PUD exists to <br />encourage comprehensive site planning, when the other option is to design a project in <br />compliance with the standard requirements of both the Zoning and Subdivision Codes. Just to <br />kind of summarize that--if a PUD comes in, in a residential zoning, you can’t add aspects of <br />commercial in that. They would have to come in for a change of zone to introduce commercial. <br />Additionally, if you have RS-10 zoning, and you have a 100,000 square feet, you’re allowed ten <br />residential structures, or ten lots, or ten buildings per each 10,000 square feet. This particular <br />planning tool allows to be able to change that concept, so instead of having a building site that <br />has to be at least 10,000, it can be minimized to 7,500 square feet and allowing one larger excess <br />lot to do other, like a park or something like that. Just, it gives, it’s a planning tool. <br /> <br />And the next reservation is that there is a concern that transferring approval authority for a PUD <br />from the Planning Director onto the Planning Commission may complicate a process that does <br />not, or does have favorable attributes, such as encouraging developments that seek a better fit <br />into the surrounding environment. Zoning controls overall, zoning controls overall land use. <br />PUD, PUD’s then manage these permitted land use to the best complement the area in which the <br />project is situated. There is a perception that a PUD is the master land use or development <br />permit. It is not. <br /> <br />If a PUD is denied by the Planning Commission, the landowner is still able to development its <br />property in accordance with the standard requirements of the Zoning Code and the Subdivision <br />Code. A denial of a PUD does not make a project necessarily go away since it is the zoning of <br />an area that dictates what gets developed and how the land is utilized. So, it’s again, a planning <br />tool. <br /> <br />The Planning Director’s recommendation for reasons detailed above, the Planning Director <br />recommends that the Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation with reservations, <br />to the County Council regarding Bill No. 281, relating to Planned Unit Developments. <br /> <br />That concludes our presentation. Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioners, any questions for staff? <br /> <br />IKEDA: Yes, I do. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commission Ikeda. <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />