My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-12-18 Leeward Exh A (Amend Zoning Code Bill No. 281)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2014
>
2014-12-18 Leeward Exh A (Amend Zoning Code Bill No. 281)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2015 2:00:28 PM
Creation date
1/15/2015 2:00:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ARAI: Could I, when the Director was explaining his position, he made a distinction that it was <br />more of a qualification than a reservation. So I just wanted to make sure how, if it’s not that big of <br />a difference, maybe -. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Would you restate that to say, “with qualifications?” Or we need to identify that, if <br />we made the word change? <br /> <br />ARAI: If the motion is based on the Director’s recommendations, then it will probably be with the <br />clarification that it’s a qualification. The only -. One moment. (Secretary’s note: Mr. Arai had a <br />brief dialogue with the Planning Director off the record.) So the commissioner’s motion and the <br />intent is to basically go with the Director’s recommendations and the qualifications that is contained <br />within his report to you, then I would state specifically as “with qualifications.” <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Mr. Chair? I know I have a motion. May I amend my motion prior to Commission <br />voting? I withdraw my, excuse me, withdraw my initial motion, and resubmit to you that the <br />Leeward Planning Commission send a favorable recommendation, with reservations dealing <br />specifically with qualifications, to the County Council regarding Bill No. 281 relating to Planned <br />Unit Development, P.U.D., permits. <br /> <br />WHITTEMORE: I second that. I’ll also withdraw my initial second on the first motion. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Okay. So for the record, let me try to summarize, the initial motion as provided by <br />Commissioner Hickcox has been withdrawn, and the second was withdrawn as well by <br />Commissioner Whittemore. Restated motion has been made by Commissioner Hickcox and <br />seconded by Commissioner Whittemore. Before we go on to vote, is there any further discussion <br />by Commissioners? Daryn, would you like to take the roll call? <br /> <br />ARAI: Sure, thank you very much. Commissioner Hickcox? <br /> <br />HICKCOX: Aye. <br /> <br />ARAI: Commissioner Whittemore? <br /> <br />WHITTEMORE: Aye. <br /> <br />ARAI: Commissioner Kaholo? <br /> <br />KAHOLO: Aye. <br /> <br />ARAI: Commissioner Nobriga? <br /> <br />NOBRIGA: Aye. <br /> <br />ARAI: Commissioner Unger? <br /> <br />UNGER: Aye. <br /> <br />ARAI: And Mr. Chairman? <br />8 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.