My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-27 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-10-27 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2021 8:31:45 AM
Creation date
1/21/2015 10:49:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br /> Minutes —October 27, 2014 <br /> Kauai and then on some working bird releases at Kekaha and Wailua <br /> GMAs. On Oahu they'd like to fill a vacant general laborer position that <br /> once — that helps with the program on Oahu —to run the hunting program <br /> there and more purchase of birds to release in the GMAs on Oahu. On <br /> Maui they want to continue with the Lanai lease and fill the positions and <br /> develop an on-line application system for the Lanai lottery hunts and then <br /> on West Hawaii and East Hawaii it's a continuation of things like the cattle <br /> hunts — as I mentioned to you earlier— that's very costly in terms of staff <br /> time — and this is the kind of program that could help fund that. <br /> And then in terms of process —was the next question and input. You know <br /> at this point the fund doesn't have a lot of leeway in terms of decision <br /> making based on the fact that we have to cover staff costs and the Lanai <br /> lease. I think if there was a state commission — that's an opportunity that <br /> that commission could discuss what the priorities would be. If the hunters <br /> statewide don't view the Lanai hunt as something that's important perhaps <br /> they could consider using those funds on something else. <br /> Man: The reason why I asked the question I just wanted to make sure this was <br /> the hunting commission [unclear] for all the hunters. We want to make <br /> sure it's not against us. <br /> L. Hadway: Yeah, 85 — it's in the statute and I am — I wish I could hand this <br /> report out right now— I called Honolulu begging them to let me release it <br /> today but until it comes out of the Governor's office — but it just basically <br /> describes what it's used for and 85% of the funds go to the hunting <br /> program and the 15% can be used for wildlife sanctuary management as <br /> well and that 15% usually includes things like predator control which will <br /> benefit both native species and save the game bird species. <br /> Chair Lodge: It doesn't look like there's, you know there's a habitat conservation <br /> plan for Puuwaawaa / Puuanahulu that's out there and WRF you know— <br /> monies from the WRF don't require a match to be spent on mammal <br /> enhancement and other things that enhance game mammals, is that <br /> correct? <br /> L. Hadway: The WRF's —we are using it as a match for Pittman-Robertson's. <br /> Chair Lodge: I understand that. You don't have to... <br /> L. Hadway: We wouldn't— it would be very challenging to budget appropriately <br /> to be able to use the Pittman-Robertson funds without using the WRF <br /> funds as match. <br /> Chair Lodge: I guess what I'm getting at is that this money, you know, every time <br /> we use a federal dollar for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, right, we're not <br /> 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.