My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-10-27 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-10-27 Game Management Advisory Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2021 8:31:45 AM
Creation date
1/21/2015 10:49:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Game Management Advisory Commission Meeting <br /> Minutes —October 27, 2014 <br /> C. Masuda: If I could suggest an amendment to that— that be in the cases <br /> where — because of the speed of the legislature sometimes you get notice <br /> at 2:00 that the meeting's being at 6:00 — that be given —those authorities <br /> be given to the legislative committee in cases where it is not possible to <br /> convene a meeting before the GMAC. <br /> Chair Lodge: OK. I would like to — I know what you're saying —we can't come <br /> back and do legislative business on a month-by-month basis. <br /> C. Masuda: [Unclear] but if it's something where it's put off and then you do <br /> have the authority because when you say carte blanche —the attorneys all <br /> go whoa, whoa, whoa! <br /> Chair Lodge: Well, what we're suggesting —what I'm suggesting when we have <br /> here — is that we conduct like writing bills, being able to write our <br /> testimony, being able to secure other agencies to support us or support <br /> from other agencies or islands or what have you without coming back to <br /> the committee — to the commission on a month-by-month basis which is <br /> unworkable — especially when it comes to the legislative... <br /> C. Masuda: That's why I'm saying — if it's a situation where there's no time for <br /> the committee to come back and still be effective, that's the authority <br /> you're given — however, that authority is limited or it is a situation where <br /> there is a upcoming meeting and the commission can properly notice it— <br /> I'd bring it before the commission... <br /> Chair Lodge: Give me an example of what you're talking about. <br /> C. Masuda: For example, if you have matters — say it's during cross over time — <br /> we'll have time to come back before the commission in lot of instances. If <br /> it's something that's been already moved on by the two committees or <br /> three —whatever the referral is — on your referral sheet at that house — <br /> and it's done already — you'll have time to come back before the <br /> commission prior to cross over. <br /> Chair Lodge: OK. I'm actually opposed to that idea. I would like the legislative <br /> committee to be able to do their job as the legislative committee and I am <br /> suggesting that this commission put their trust and confidence in that <br /> legislative committee. There is — being — gone through two legislative <br /> sessions already — I can see that that is for us really a burden, cause we <br /> have to get it on an agenda, we have to then discuss it. As far as <br /> legislation goes.... <br /> D. Yoshina: I think then we run into Sunshine and all of that and I don't know. <br /> But you know you guys are asking me to trust you guys... <br /> 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.