My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-01-08 Hearing Transcript-PD INITIATED _GAMBLE_ SPP 1078 & SMA 408
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-01-08 Hearing Transcript-PD INITIATED _GAMBLE_ SPP 1078 & SMA 408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 11:49:48 AM
Creation date
2/5/2015 11:49:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DARROW: The motion does not pass, three to one. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Any further discussion? I guess my comment is again, you know, we’re not, <br />we’re not denying outright the use of special—of them doing this in the future. We’re just <br />saying they need to come and specify in a future meeting events that they would like to conduct <br />and give the public their due opportunity to give their comments, and at that time, we could <br />decide what events are proper and not proper, and not set a precedence of leaving an open-ended <br />interpretation by the private owner. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Mr. Chairman? <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioner Henkel. <br /> <br />HENKEL: I would agree, too, that you know to keep this from happening again in the future <br />that you might try to amend specifically your S-your Special Use Permit. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Yes, I agree. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: That’s what I’d like to see. I’d like to see the Gambles come back with specific <br />uses that you could include specifically within this app—their permit. Commissioners, any <br />further discussion? If not, I’ll accept another motion. <br /> <br />AUDIENCE MEMBER: Excuse me, I have something. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Our public testimony portion has been closed. Okay, Commissioners, no—no <br />motion to put forward. Okay— <br /> <br />DARROW: Mr. Chairman, if I can interject, just so we can kind of understand where we go <br />from here. With no direction or motion that passes, it appears that the Planning Department is <br />still in the position that if we do receive complaints, similar complaints, we will have to follow <br />up similarly as we have in the past. And, again, the Commission has recommended to the <br />Applicants that it would, it might be good to come back for an amendment to specify those units <br />[sic], those additional uses, but just to clarify, the Planning Department is still in a position that <br />we would have to enforce the particular complaints that come in. Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, Commissioners, if there’s no motion, then I guess for the recommendation <br />should be to the Planning Department to follow up with a letter of the concerns that was put <br />forward here today and continue working with the Gambles. <br /> <br />DARROW: That’s the other option. We can continue, if you, if the Planning Commission feels <br />maybe to bring this back to the Commission, maybe with additional Commissioners. It’s, that’s <br />another option. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, Commissioners, no motion to defer or continue, then, if not, we will leave <br />it in the hands of the Planning Department. <br />15 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.