Laserfiche WebLink
<br />So, we—the Applicants believe that what these particular uses is allowable under the permit. <br />The Planning Director does not feel they are permitted and has issued a warning letter for the, for <br />the particular use stating that the collectible sales business is not a permitted use in the State <br />Land Use Ag District, or within the approved permits. <br /> <br />We feel this is confirmed by Deputy Director’s Kokubun statement where he says, “I think one <br />of the guidelines for us in terms of a special permit, one of the guidelines for the permission, is <br />that the uses be fairly specific.” And that’s the way that usually when we have Special Permits <br />come before the Planning Commission, they’re asking for a specific use. Again, he asked do you <br />have a list of other uses that you would like to be permitted and the response was the only thing <br />we had anticipated for was to use it for what we had mentioned, the weddings and continuing the <br />town meetings. <br /> <br />As a result of these discussions at the hearing, Condition 3 was added to specifically allow <br />weddings, community and public meetings on the subject property. <br /> <br />That concludes our presentation, but again, the Planning Department will continue working with <br />the Applicants regarding compliance or noncompliance with the conditions. We—because of the <br />fact that there is a disagreement regarding whether a use is permitted or not, we feel it was <br />appropriate to come back to the Planning Commission and have the Commission make that <br />determination. Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioners, any questions for staff? <br /> <br />IKEDA: Yes, I do. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioner Ikeda. <br /> <br />IKEDA: You know, maybe I, I misread this thing, but I read in here in two sections where it <br />stated that the former owner of the property didn’t have meetings and things like that on his <br />property. It was—am I mistaken? Did I misread it? <br /> <br />DARROW: We—in Exhibit 9, or I’m sorry, yes, Exhibit 9, we had received a correspondence <br />from Carlos Parisi, and with that correspondence were two letters from the previous owners, and <br />basically they are stating that those events did not occur on the property previously. <br />Additionally, thank you for bringing that to my attention, this morning, we did receive additional <br />correspondence from Mr. Parisi as well as from the Applicant, and so those have been handed <br />out. The Applicant submitted a response letter with items attached to that, and there were also <br />two letters of support attached to that. Thank you. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Okay, can I ask you another question? I—I remember reading somewhere that the <br />street light wasn’t put in and the road condition was, wasn’t put in but it never stated it was <br />completed or not. Was it completed? <br /> <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />