My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-01-15 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Cost of Government Commission
>
Minutes
>
2014-2015
>
2015-01-15 Cost of Government Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2015 9:34:23 AM
Creation date
2/13/2015 9:33:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />decision from an elected official to make which is why an appointed body like the Water <br />Board looks solely at the interest of the department. <br /> <br />Mr. Matsuda said he would accept it as written. Mr. Perry stated the Water <br />Department is made to or can and has the capacity to break even or not to lose money. <br />Ms. Kierkiewicz suggested saying grant Environmental Management Commission <br />authority to set fees. Ms. Garson said it is a County Code amendment. <br /> <br /> Mr. Espejo asked if there will be a checks and balance system in place because <br />having people on the commission set the rate, who would they answer to if they set the <br />rate too high. Ms. Garson replied for rate increases, public hearings need to be held. <br />She noted the Water Board does rate studies; it cannot just raise the rates. Ms. <br />Maddox asked if the Water Board have a system of checks and balances. Ms. Garson <br />replied statutorily they are supposed to; there is a statute that says you can for <br />operations and CIP but there is a cap on how much you can have on reserve. Mr. <br />Espejo noted if there is that kind of protocol with the Environmental Management <br />Commission in making rate increases, he is in agreement with the recommendation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mitchell said the Water Department serves over 41,000 customers and he <br />agrees with Mr. Matsuda that as they move forward, they will take a look at the Water <br />Supply language as a model. <br /> <br />Discussion held and recommendation amended to read as follows: <br /> <br />Explore the possibility of the Environmental Management Commission <br />having the authority, like the Board of Water Supply, to set fees rather <br />than the County Council codifying rate increases in the County Code. <br /> <br />Motion and Vote <br />: Mr. Matsuda moved to approve the recommendation <br />as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Espejo and all <br />Commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br />BB. Conduct study related to waste water rates, which were last adjusted in <br />2002, including a multi-year schedule of planned increases/adjustments. <br />(12/4/14 meeting minutes, pg 4, BJ Leithead-Todd presentation) <br /> <br />Discussion held and recommendation amended to read as follows: <br /> <br />Conduct study related to waste water rates, which were last adjusted in <br />2002, including a multi-year schedule of planned increased/adjustments. <br /> <br />Motion and Vote <br />: Mr. Matsuda moved to approve the recommendation <br />as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Perry and all <br />Commissioners present voted aye. <br /> <br />CC. Explore possibility of giving Wastewater Division ability to separate costs <br />of electricity or diesel fuel on consumers’ bills and to pass changes in <br />those costs on to consumers. (12/4/14 meeting minutes, pg 7, BJ <br />Leithead-Todd presentation) <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.