My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-03-05 HearingTranscript - Moaniala Holdings LLC REZ 738
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-03-05 HearingTranscript - Moaniala Holdings LLC REZ 738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2015 1:58:22 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 1:58:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
hasn’t granted the funding, so the cost of building a bridge, putting that entire cost on one <br />developer is not, not proportional, it’s not reasonable for the scale of their development. <br /> <br />So, the Applicant, the condition reads that the Applicant would still build those two roadways <br />except for the bridge, the Kawailani Street Extension and Kupulau Street Extension. <br /> <br />And, then going on to Condition H—Condition H, the Applicant requested fair share fee offsets <br />which we, we typically include in rezones whenever an applicant constructs roadway <br />improvements or provides land for parks, we usually grant a fair share offset. So, in this case, <br />the Applicant requested some changes to that condition and the Planning Department is <br />recommending again favorable with a little bit of modification, and that basically being that if <br />the developer constructs those two roadways except for the bridge, they receive offsets from <br />their fair share for that cost. And, if for some reason, during the upcoming General Plan <br />Amendment, if it’s decided that either of those extensions are no longer desirable for regional <br />roadway, then we would release the developer from that obligation, but they would still have to <br />pay their fair share assessment. <br /> <br />So, I think that kind of in a nutshell describes the request. This is the site plan showing the entire <br />development. You see Phase 1 here which is already completed. This is the, this is Kūkūau <br />Street entering their property, and then Phase 2, what is shown as Phase—I’m sorry, Phase 2 is <br />over here. So, that has not been developed yet, and that shows a roadway providing access to <br />each lot as well as the future Kawailani Street Extension here. And then, Phase 3 shows again <br />this roadway here providing access to each lot, and then the Kupulau Street Extension in this <br />area here. So, the drainage easement that requires a bridge is located just south of Puainako <br />Street in this location. <br /> <br />These are some photos of the site. This is standing at the corner of Puainako Street and the <br />project access on Kūkūau Street, looking towards Hilo. And then this is looking up Puainako <br />Street, and this is looking into the project site. You can see the entry sign, Hilo Hillside. And <br />then this is a picture of that drainage easement area that would require a bridge to connect <br />Puainako Street to the development. <br /> <br />As I had mentioned before, the Planning Director, Director’s recommending a favorable <br />recommendation with modifications to the Applicant’s request. And, I do want to call your <br />attention to one item that the Applicant provided to us this morning. It’s a, about four maps, and <br />I believe the Applicant’s going to discuss that. <br /> <br />Are there any questions? <br /> <br />MOSES: Commissioners, any question of staff? Okay, will the Applicant or their representative <br />please come forward and be seated at the table in front of the Commissioners? <br /> <br />FUKE: Good morning. <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.