My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-04-02 HearingTranscript - Harry and Sandra Freitas _REZ 14-185_
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-04-02 HearingTranscript - Harry and Sandra Freitas _REZ 14-185_
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2015 12:15:18 PM
Creation date
5/7/2015 12:15:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />roll be taken, that we defer this until our next Windward Planning Commission, so that we can <br />provide the Commission and the Applicants with conditions of approval that can be forwarded <br />along with the recommendation. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Okay. Do we have to withdraw our motions? <br /> <br />DARROW: I believe it can remain. <br /> <br />HENKEL: Mr. Chair? Mr. Chair? Can we go forward with the recommendation and make our <br />own conditions rather than wait on the Planning Department, legally? <br /> <br />MIYASATO: What do you recommend? <br /> <br />HENKEL: We’ll just say the Council re-visit the requirements by Department of Water Supply <br />about catchment or private systems. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: But that, that was with a neg—that was with a negative recommendation. <br /> <br />HALL: Is that—you guys waiting for a question from him? <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, Commissioner Henkel, do you have a question? Do you have a-- <br /> <br />HENKEL: Well, I’m just, this is a question I guess for Corp Counsel. Can we make a <br />recommendation for approval to Council and ask them to revisit the requirements set by the <br />Department of Water Supply for a—the water systems to include catchment and filtration. <br /> <br />KANUHA: Mr. Chairman, I think what, what Commissioner Henkel is requesting—is this along <br />the lines of what the Applicant had requested because— <br /> <br />HENKEL: --yes— <br /> <br />KANUHA: --yeah, bec— <br /> <br />HENKEL: --I mean instead of waiting a month if can just move this forward— <br /> <br />KANUHA: --right, but, but their request was assuming that the Commission would support a <br />negative recommendation, so the negative recommendation would go up with this strong <br />requirement to reconsider the concurrency requirements. What I sense the Commission wants to <br />do is provide a favorable recommendation. <br /> <br />HENKEL: That’s the motion, yeah. <br /> <br />KANUHA: Right, in which case what we’re looking for is procedurally a way to recognize that <br />that’s the way the Commission wants to go, but still give the Department the opportunity to <br />provide you with a, a series of, with a favorable recommendation— <br /> <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.