My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-04-08 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2015
>
2015-04-08 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2015 2:54:12 PM
Creation date
4/23/2015 2:53:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Kahakalau; Yes. We've already spoken with the clerks about that. We are also <br /> hoping that we will have a least one or two more members by the <br /> next time. If anyone has any names to submit, Emily will be <br /> happy to forward those so that we have a full Board that would be <br /> great. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: One question for Counsel on that. It's really not an agenda item <br /> but I think we're alright. As far as the Sunshine Law, members <br /> discussing leadership of a Board. There's three (3) of us so just <br /> two of us talking is the majority so there's an issue there. When <br /> there are more members, I don't know, I mean I guess I can look it <br /> up I don't want to put you on the spot. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: It's in your book Mr. Goodenow. Sunshine Law. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I want to make sure that we all are cognizant of that. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: I would just encourage that the discussion to be held in open <br /> session. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Maybe we should just do that anyway. Why even, regardless we'll <br /> take the higher road and not discuss it period. <br /> Mr. Adams: I'm not sure what the discussion would be, but I think that from the <br /> purposes of understanding quorum. As I understand our Rules of <br /> Practice and Procedures we have three (3) of us, the majority of the <br /> total Board when we have a vote. Our ability to vote affirmatively <br /> on anything is three (3), a requirement of three (3). So at the <br /> current time any affirmative vote as I understand it I could be <br /> wrong, an affirmative vote requires a unanimous vote of the three <br /> of us. Once you have more than three (3) then it's gonna change. <br /> At the moment any quorum is three (3) and then any vote that <br /> takes place has to be a majority of the Board size not just Board as <br /> populated. <br /> Mr. Yoshimoto: So I would encourage that we not go any further cause this is not in <br /> the announcement section. Madame Chair please make the <br /> announcement of the next meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.