Laserfiche WebLink
operation. That was what he was paid, and he well earned that. He has left my employ now and <br />gone to Boise, Idaho ‘cause we can’t keep him busy. <br /> <br />I would like the consideration from our past history when we appeared here before the board. <br />That was another lady chairman then, Mrs. Leithead. I went to see her a short time ago, and we <br />had a good visit. We had very good relations with her, and I hope we can have good <br />relationships with you people. <br /> <br />MOSES: Thank you. Commissioners, any questions for the applicant? Thank you. You may <br />be seated. <br /> <br />DAHLBERG: Can I make one last point? <br /> <br />MOSES: Okay. <br /> <br />DAHLBERG: I’m sorry. HOVE Road— <br /> <br />DARROW: Mic. <br /> <br />MOSES: Please use your microphone. <br /> <br />DAHLBERG: HOVE RMC can undertake the improvements they seem to want to identify and <br />condition the applicant is responsible for. Their by-laws seem to allow for such improvements <br />and then some. If you haven’t read the by-laws, they’re only a few pages long. What I’m <br />specifically speaking to is sections 5.8 and 5.9, lien for assessments and other amounts, effect of <br />nonpayment of assessment, remedies of the corporation. Again, does the Planning Commission <br />really want to police these by-laws. <br /> <br />Thank you for your time. <br /> <br />MOSES: Thank you, Mr. Dahlberg. Okay, so looks like we have public testimony. Oh, sorry, <br />thank you, thank you. The petitioners, can the petitioners please come forward? And can we <br />also have the Planning Director’s representative, please come forward. Okay, I’m going to <br />swear you all in. Could you please raise your right hand? Do you swear--do you swear or affirm <br />to tell the truth on this matter now before the Planning Commission? <br /> <br />RAZNOV/FOSTER/SELF/KANUHA: I do. <br /> <br />MOSES: Thank you. We’ll start left— <br /> <br />PATEL: Just as a quick reminder. Just be sure to focus on the petition for standing at this point. <br />If standing is granted, of course, you’ll have an opportunity to argue the merits of the case, but at <br />this stage, we want to focus on why standing should or should not be granted, and then thereafter <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />