My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-07-16 Leeward Exh C (Amend SMA 314)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-07-16 Leeward Exh C (Amend SMA 314)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 2:48:49 PM
Creation date
8/20/2015 2:48:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BEAUDET: Commissioners? <br /> <br />CHURCH: Just curious. So the property remains a single piece of property; it’s not subdivided <br />right now. <br /> <br />DARROW: Correct. <br /> <br />CHURCH: But there are two dwellings on the property. Are they owned by a single owner or there <br />are two owners? <br /> <br />DARROW: Two owners. <br /> <br />CHURCH: So there must be undivided interest then as tenancy in common. What is the ownership <br />there? <br /> <br />DARROW: It is through a Condominium Property Regime; so basically, what you would see is <br />several owners to one single property and they own elements in common. I’m not extremely <br />familiar with how the layout is for this particular ownership. I believe the applicant can touch upon <br />that. But usually what will happen is you’ll have several owners of one property. <br /> <br />CHURCH: But that has not been filed; a Condominium Regime has not been yet --. <br /> <br />DARROW: It has been. <br /> <br />CHURCH: -- oh, has, okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: Yes. <br /> <br />CHURCH: There it is then. Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />DARROW: What’s happened now is, previously the applicant would apply to the Real Estate <br />Commission for a CPR, the Planning Department has now changed their Rules that you, to be able <br />to go through a CPR through the Planning Department, you have to meet the same requirements that <br />you would need to meet through a subdivision. So it would make sense that, if you are going to go <br />through that, that you would go through the subdivision to be able to have your ownership, separate <br />ownership, to each of the lots at that point. Any other questions? <br /> <br />So just to reiterate, or just to go further with that, the applicants have spoken with the owners, and <br />they are in the process of deciding whether or not they want to withdraw the CPR and go forward <br />with a subdivision so that they could have their own ownership interest in the properties. And that’s <br />why we made the change to add in Final Subdivision Approval in the conditions. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Thank you, staff. Any further discussion, Commissioners? I’d like to call the <br />applicant or its representative forward. Please raise your right hand. Do you swear or affirm to tell <br />the truth now and before the Leeward Planning Commission? <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.