Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />One additional matter that I would like to note is that when the County made some <br />improvements to Kaūmana Drive, they actually, for better for worse, “cock-a-roached” a portion <br />of Mr. Rodrigues’ property, so there is approximately like about 17,000 square feet of land that, <br />that runs parallel to Kaūmana Drive that was actually improved with the pavement section. And, <br />so Mr. Rodrigues actually has an indemnification agreement with the County at this point in <br />time. <br /> <br />The staff’s proposed condition, you know, requires that he relinquish that portion, and Mr. <br />Rodrigues is gladly willing to relinquish that portion and not absorb any potential liability <br />associated with, you know, with that property. <br /> <br />He has had a chance to review all of the, the staff’s proposed conditions as well as the <br />Background Report, and have found all of them to be acceptable. So, if you have questions of <br />myself or Mr. Rodrigues, we’d be more than happy to answer. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioners, any questions? If not, thank you. <br /> <br />FUKE: Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Do we have anyone wishing to testify on this application? If not, I’ll take a <br />motion to close public testimony. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Move to close public testimony. <br /> <br />MOSES: Second. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: I have a motion by Commissioner Ikeda; second by Commissioner Moses. All in <br />favor? <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Any opposed? I’ll call a close to the public testimony for this application. <br />Commissioners, any discussion on this application? You know, for me, I just have a short <br />comment that, you know, with this, couple weeks ago, we had a similar application for family <br />purposes, subdividing for family purposes, and unfortunately, that application—there was no <br />water service in the immediate area that would have been feasible. I’m glad that this project has <br />a closer location although it seems there’s a subdivision within a mile that has adequate rainfall, <br />and that would be I guess a lot more affordable to subdivide if that concurrency policy was <br />amended. So, again, you know, I think the Council needs to be encouraged to take another look <br />at that policy. You know, it’s—we have a lot of families that just want to subdivide for their <br />children and to make it unfeasible to do so because of other conditions on the other side of the <br />Island that was trying to be stopped I think is a sad thing. So, that’s my only comment I have. If <br />there’s no other comment, I’ll accept a motion. <br /> <br /> <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br /> <br />