My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-10-01 Hearing Transcript - Eric Hoota REZ 758
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-10-01 Hearing Transcript - Eric Hoota REZ 758
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2015 2:32:54 PM
Creation date
11/5/2015 2:32:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />DARROW: I’m sorry—I missed— <br /> <br />IKEDA: Where is the property located? Where is Lono Street as compared to Kamana Street? <br /> <br />DARROW: Are you familiar with the Big Island Educational Credit Union? <br /> <br />IKEDA: Yes. <br /> <br />DARROW: It’s right there. I, I believe this is the property that like once a year they have the <br />fireworks sales. <br /> <br />IKEDA: The one right across— <br /> <br />DARROW: Right across the street. That side street is Lono Street, and this would be on Kīlauea <br />Street. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: Yeah, so this, this gives you an idea. The credit union would be just on your left, <br />right over here. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: And so, yeah, that’s kinda how I was able to recognize this property because of <br />the— <br /> <br />IKEDA: I was, I was thinking it was closer to the senior center. <br /> <br />DARROW: Yeah, thank you. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Sorry, I had a question. And, am I correct in understanding that the initial <br />condition is that construction be completed by January 26, 1997? <br /> <br />DARROW: Correct. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: And then there was a single extension moving that deadline for completion of <br />construction to January 26, 2000? <br /> <br />DARROW: This would have been, the original construction would have been five years from <br />the date of the original ordinance. So, the original ordinance was passed in January of 1994. So, <br />then, we would have gone to 1999. Correct? Let’s see. Maija asked me if I would cover for her <br />this morning, so please be patient with me. Oh, no I’m sorry. You’re right. The original <br />Condition E required three years and then they received an additional three years for an <br />administrative time extension. So, currently there is the administration time extension has been <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.