Laserfiche WebLink
139 Curtis Tyler's previous motion in regard to the 10 -year review. <br />140 <br />141 Curtis Tyler made a motion that the Action Committee recommends and <br />142 requests the Director initialize and involve the AC and interested community <br />143 members, under the careful guidance of and with input from the West Hawaii <br />144 Planning office, in a process that will lead to the "Redevelopment Plan for <br />145 Kailua Village" called for in the KCDP. Such a process would include the goal <br />146 of compiling a priority list of essential elements that must be included in a <br />147 new, consolidated Master Plan, which, per the KCDP, would encompass the <br />148 KCDP's two overlapping and surrounding lands mauka of Kuakini and north <br />149 of Kailua Village (centered on Makae'o); a review the 1994 Kailua Village <br />150 Master Plan would be part of this process. Once compiled, the AC would <br />151 provide the Planning Director with a three-tier set of redevelopment - <br />152 development planning elements and objectives, which should be addressed <br />153 as soon as possible thereafter. [By way of clarification, per the KCDP. the <br />154 three tiers are the Kailua Village "core" which must be treated uniquely, the <br />155 mauka-south side of "Kailua-Kona," and the north half, which is Lanihau <br />156 makai and Keahuolu makai. <br />157 <br />158 Hiram Rivera seconded this motion. Curtis Tyler made a motion to table this <br />159 item, and Kari Kimura seconded that. All in favor, and the motion was carried <br />160 unanimously. <br />161 <br />162 SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS <br />163 <br />164 None. <br />165 <br />166 STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC <br />167 <br />168 Chuck Flaherty stated that he was asked to attend this meeting by Janice Palma <br />169 Glennie with regard to the attached motion that was made. He said that he reviewed <br />170 Chapter 25 to try to understand why this motion was made. He explained that he <br />171 doesn't see the specific issues and conflicts, and as a member of the public, he is <br />172 having a hard time understanding it. <br />173 <br />174 Doug Payne spoke up to clarify that the Project District has a 50 -acre minimum lot <br />175 size, but the CDP has a 20 acre minimum lot size - meaning there is an inherent <br />176 conflict right there. He went on to explain that there are many issues and instances <br />177 where the Community Development Plan doesn't reflect reality. <br />178 <br />179 Chuck went on to explain that this is supposed to be the Kona Community <br />180 Development Plan, not the Kona Community Developers' Plan. He stated that there <br />181 was no announcement of this meeting, no outreach to the community, and that this <br />182 is a huge problem. He explained the need for examples and getting everything in <br />183 writing so everyone can be on the same page. Not just the committee, but members <br />184 of the general public who may not be able to attend the meetings, and would at least <br />