My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-11-05 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon USE 15-055
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2015
>
2015-11-05 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership dba Verizon USE 15-055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2015 2:54:00 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 2:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MCGUIRE: My name is John McGuire, and I— <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Use the mic, please. <br /> <br />MCGUIRE: My name is John McGuire. I live at 18-4173 Komo Street. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Just a quick note, yeah, you have three minutes. <br /> <br />MCGUIRE: Yeah, I basically said what I said, but I think that the County should address <br />Section 4-6 of your guys’ laws, you know, before any of this is done. The property needs to be <br />flood free again. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. Mr. Oguss? Dr. Oguss? <br /> <br />OGUSS: Yes. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: You have three minutes. Please state your name and residence. <br /> <br />OGUSS: Dr. Carl Frederick Oguss. My primary residence is 121 Banyan Drive. I am interested <br />for two reasons. One is, there is another application from Verizon for the Fern Forest area, and I <br />have 271 acres immediately adjacent to that location, and I wanted to come to this meeting to get <br />a feeling for what the process was going to be like, what the meetings were going to be like. <br /> <br />In addition, my background is—I’m a psychologist, and my field was doing research in moral <br />development, and I can say two things. The more open this process is, the better it’s going to be <br />received by the community. Attempts to, for instance, challenge standing on the basis of a <br />formality of filing date is an attempt to find an excuse not to listen to a member of the <br />community. Whether he lives adjacent or whether he lives nearby shouldn’t really much matter. <br />The process should be very open to everyone who feels that they may be directly affected by <br />these towers. The effects are deemed to be safe under Federal standards, but you really need to <br />look into this issue. <br /> <br />The rest of the world does not take the same position on cell phone towers that the United States <br />and the UK does. There have been landmark lawsuits in Germany, France, Italy, and India so far <br />proving after years of legal battle, that there have been long-term, very serious negative effects. <br />I don’t say this lightly. I actually started looking into the research with the assumption that it’s <br />probably safe. And my only concern might be public perception, because even things that seem <br />safe like GMO’s may be perceived to be unsafe and that affects the market value of those <br />products. Well, my 271 acres is zoned Ag-3. There’s a tremendous of value there. The Fern <br />Forest community is a very large community. A lot of people own property there that’s their <br />primary investment. The perceived value of those properties when a large cell phone tower goes <br />in that is highly visible is a real issue. And, beyond that, there are aesthetic issues. People just <br />not wanting the area to look so industrial. <br /> <br /> <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.