Laserfiche WebLink
if they were just submitting testimony, but they, unfortunately, it remained unclear. We tried to <br />express to be present for the hearing. I’m not sure if the petitioner is present at this time. <br /> <br />With that, that concludes our presentation. Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Commissioners, any questions for staff? Thank you. Okay, do we have the <br />petitioners, Shun Kwan or Yuk Wah Wong present? <br /> <br />ARAI: Mr. Chairman, sorry I stepped out just for a moment and missed the discussion earlier, <br />but the petitioner for intervention, we did receive the petition just early this morning, so we <br />quickly made a phone call to the petitioner, and she clarified that she does not care about the <br />application. I did ask her specifically if she had any specific objections to the application, and <br />she said no, but in the end she did say she did not care, so I have the understanding that she <br />misunderstood what it meant to file that particular form for the petition. And, she did indicate <br />that she is working and will not be able to attend today’s hearing. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: So, it’s withdrawn by the? <br /> <br />ARAI: It is not withdrawn. I believe you would still need to dispatch with the petition as it was <br />filed even though it was filed late and without a fee. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />PATEL: And, just to note for the record, too, I’m looking at the petition for standing and as far <br />as all the questions, she’s checked off no, so I—you know, I can understand how there might <br />have been some kind of misunderstanding on the petitioner’s part. But, I just wanted to call the <br />Commissioner’s attention to that, but, as Daryn mentioned, we will still need action taken on this <br />petition. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay—okay, so the first order of business regarding this agenda item is to <br />determine whether to accept a petition for standing from, for standing from Shun Kwan and Yuk <br />th <br />Wah Wong received by the Planning Department November 5, 2015. Commissioners, does the, <br />does County have any comment on this? <br /> <br />SELF: Yes, we would just like to state on the record that we object to this particular petition <br />based on the same, the same reason for the other petition which is based on Planning <br />Commission Rule 4-6(a). It was filed this morning, which misses the seven-day deadline, and <br />there is no filing fee, and as pointed out by your counsel, the first question is, “Is your interest in <br />this matter clearly distinguishable from that of the general public?” And, this petitioner checked <br />off no. So, on, based on all of that, we would just like to state our objection to the petition. <br />Thank you. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay. Mr. Shaffer, I’ll just remind you that you’re still under oath, yeah? Do <br />you have any objection to this petition? <br /> <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br /> <br />