Laserfiche WebLink
In Brief <br />Background <br />A Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) is an <br />electrical device designed to monitor and protect <br />a swimming pool/spa filtration or water feature <br />pump by varying the frequency or speed of the <br />motor in order to provide a specific flow rate. <br />Research has shown that VFDs reduce costs <br />and usage of electricity and energy, potentially <br />recouping the cost of purchasing and installing a <br />VFD in less than a year. <br />The Department of Parks & Recreation (P&R), <br />Aquatics Division is responsible for programs <br />and operation of nine public swimming pools. <br />They also develop and implement a <br />comprehensive water safety program by <br />providing lifeguard services at County swimming <br />pools. <br />Why we did this audit <br />While performing a risk assessment at P&R, we <br />found that installing VFDs at County swimming <br />pools could reduce operating costs. <br />The objective of the audit was to evaluate the <br />cost effectiveness of installing Variable <br />Frequency Drives (VFDs) at swimming pools <br />countywide. <br />Kona Community Aquatics Center, Kailua-Kona, HI <br />Photo courtesy of the Department of Parks & Recreation <br />What we fou n <br />In 2006, the Department of Parks & Recreation (P&R) <br />began taking proactive measures by installing Variable <br />Frequency Drives (VFDs) at three of its swimming pools <br />including Charles "Sparky" Kawamoto Swim Stadium, <br />Pahoa Community Aquatic Center (PCAC), and <br />Laupahoehoe Swimming Pool (no longer in use). P&R <br />has not had program objectives for reducing costs since <br />Fiscal Year 2012-2013 and has not installed VFDs at <br />any of the seven remaining pools. <br />Historic average monthly electrical savings of installing <br />these VFDs ranged from 23 percent (PCAC) to 63 <br />percent (Kawamoto). By installing VFDs countywide, we <br />estimate an annual cost savings of approximately <br />$122,578. Furthermore, the County should recoup <br />installation costs within the first three years. After this <br />point, all electrical cost savings are in favor of the <br />County. <br />Management generally agreed with the comments and <br />recommendations in this report. Their complete <br />response to this audit can be found on pages 13: <br />Management's Comments. <br />L —A=Md <br />What we recommended <br />The recommendations identify actions for management <br />to increase cost-effective measures at County -owned <br />pools by: <br />Reinstating P&R's previous program measures <br />related to reduction of utility costs at all facilities <br />by implementing green technologies and <br />proactive practices, or at a minimum, develop a <br />new program measure that addresses reduction <br />of cost and/or energy savings. <br />Developing and implementing a written plan for <br />installing VFDs at all County operated swimming <br />pools. Then incorporate the plan into future <br />fiscal years' budget that will reflect the <br />installation of VFDs and reduction of electricity <br />expenditures. <br />