My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-29 Windward Planning Commission Minutes - Site Visitation (Arrow & Rodrigues)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Minutes
>
2016
>
2016-01-29 Windward Planning Commission Minutes - Site Visitation (Arrow & Rodrigues)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2016 3:32:26 PM
Creation date
2/4/2016 3:32:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />There were eleven members of the public signed up to testify, and Chairman Heaukulani <br />confirmed with each of the testifiers that they were not board members of HOVE RMC. <br /> <br /> <br />1.Suzanne Mendenhall of Ocean View testified in support of the applications and stated <br />that closing the cinder pits created a personal hardship as she used the cinder to <br />maintain her driveway that gets washed away repeatedly during severe rain and to <br />maintain and landscape her property. <br /> <br /> <br />2.Steven Brix of Ocean View testified in support of the applications and would like to <br />see the quarry operations continue. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Tito Haggardt of Ocean View testified that egress from the cinder pits was approved <br />by a previous road maintenance board and felt that egress from the cinder pits was not <br />a matter for the board unless there was an issue with public safety. He also expressed <br />that the proposed map did not necessarily represent serious issues of safety adding <br />that there were two accidents where lives were lost as a direct result of cinder mining. <br /> <br /> <br />4.Schaunlee Blaine of Ocean View testified in support of the applications and stated <br />that getting cinder anywhere else was cost exorbitant. <br /> <br /> <br />5.Scott Winnop of Ocean View testified in support of the applications and stated that <br />when he got cinder elsewhere, the product was terrible and expensive. He felt that <br />the cinder pits were good for the local community. <br /> <br /> <br />6.Ralph Roland of Ocean View felt that the community was not being engaged in this <br />process in a meaningful way. He stated that cinder mining was necessary but also <br />expressed his frustration and concern that the “whole story” was not identified. He <br />would also like to see “regulatory consideration” given to truck operators. <br /> <br /> <br />7.Bill Shock of Ocean View testified in support of the applications. He stated that the <br />cinder pits were necessary because Ocean View was an agricultural community. <br /> <br /> <br />8.Ted Whip of Ocean View testified in support of the applications stating that the <br />community needed soil and water as an agricultural community. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Richard Crook of Ocean View testified in support of the applications stating that the <br />cinder pits were necessary for the community. <br /> <br /> <br />10. Robert McNut of Ocean View testified in support of the applications stating that the <br />community wanted the cinder pits back. <br /> <br /> <br />11.Wayne Greenwood of Ocean View testified in support of the applications and felt the <br />cinder pits were needed in the community. <br /> <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Windward Planning Commission <br />January 29, 2016 Minutes <br /> Arrow of Oregon/Hawaiʽi, LLC (Amend SPP 09-076) and David & Laura Rodrigues (SPP 15-178) SITE VISITATION <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.