My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-22 Police Commission Regular Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Police Department
>
Police Commission
>
Minutes
>
2016 - 2020
>
2016
>
2016-01-22 Police Commission Regular Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2016 9:56:30 AM
Creation date
2/29/2016 9:56:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hawaii Police Commission <br />Regular Session Minutes <br />January 22, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br />agreement. A majority of police administrators and police officers support the body <br />worn camera, but the labor unions oppose it. Issues are still ongoing. <br />Recess was called at 10:37 a.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:55 a.m. <br />EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed to the public.) <br />Commissioner Bertsch motioned to meet in executive session to consult with <br />Corporation Counsel on questions and issues pertaining to the commission's powers, <br />duties, privileges, immunities, and liabilities; to consider discipline and charges against <br />officers or employees of the Hawaii Police Department; to consider sensitive matters <br />relating to public safety; and to work on the annual evaluation of the Police Chief <br />pursuant to HRS 92-5 (a) (2) (4) (6) and the Hawaii County Charter Section 13-20 (b). <br />Vice Chair Morioka seconded, and it carried unanimously. <br />Regular session reconvened at 12:32 p.m. <br />ACTION ON EXECUTIVE SESSION MATTERS <br />• Complaint HPC 15-43: Complainant alleged that during an eviction process, an <br />officer deprived him of due process. He also complained about his treatment in the <br />cellblock. Commissioner Bertsch motioned that there was insufficient evidence to <br />prove the complaint's allegation of misconduct. Commissioner Buckman seconded, <br />and it carried unanimously. <br />• Complaint HPC 15-44: Complainant alleged that an officer called his employer to <br />inform them of his speeding in a company vehicle. Commissioner Bertsch motioned <br />that there was insufficient evidence to prove the complainant's allegation of <br />misconduct. Commissioner Hendricks seconded, and it carried unanimously. <br />• Complaint HPC 15-50: Complainant alleged that during a traffic stop, an officer <br />used profanity against them. Commissioner Bertsch motioned that there was <br />insufficient evidence to prove the complainant's allegation of misconduct. <br />Commissioner Gomes seconded, and it carried unanimously. <br />• Complaint HPC 15-51: Complainant complained about the manner in which an <br />officer conducted a traffic stop. Commissioner Bertsch motioned that there was <br />insufficient evidence to prove the complainant's allegation of misconduct. <br />Commissioner Hilton seconded, and it carried unanimously. <br />• Complaint HPC 15-52: Complainant complained about the manner in which an <br />officer handled a domestic situation that her daughter was involved it. <br />Commissioner Bertsch motioned that there was insufficient evidence to prove the <br />complainant's allegations of misconduct. Vice Chair Morioka seconded, and it <br />carried unanimously. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.