2016-02-04 Hearing Transcript - Arrow SPP 09-076 & Rodrigues SPP 15-178

Home

RODRIGUES, L.: No. HEAUKULANI: Thank you both. Good morning, Mr. Yeh. We’ve just been provided with a couple of documents that I understand you are proposing to provide to the Commissioners for this— YEH: —And, actually, and my apologies, because I think we had extras that we should be providing to the parties and their counsel. One was sections of the County Code which have been referenced by both of the Applicants in their Exceptions. Another one is just a copy of an existing exhibit that’s already in the record that I wanted to reference to during my argument. HEAUKULANI: Mr. Vitousek, do you have copies of these documents? VITOUSEK: No, no we don’t. YEH: Thank you. I did bring extra copies so there should be sufficient numbers. HEAUKULANI: Just give us a minute, and let us circulate copies of these documents to the parties and counsel. Okay, we circulated documents received from Mr. Yeh, and I believe one of those documents is already in the record. I’m sorry, I don’t have a copy with me. Was that Exhibit 9? YEH: That was Planning Department Exhibit 9. HEAUKULANI: And then you’ve also circulated copies of County Code—Mr. Vitousek, do you have a position on— VITOUSEK: —I have no objection. I mean, the County Code, and the Commission’s perfectly able to take judicial notice of the County Code and if he wants to refer to a document that’s already in evidence as part of argument, I think that’s appropriate. HEAUKULANI: Thank you, sir. Mr. Rodrigues? RODRIGUES, D.: No objection. HEAUKULANI: No objection. Thank you, sir. Ms. Self? SELF: No objection. HEAUKULANI: All right, thank you. That makes it easy. Then I’ll ask staff to circulate what was marked for identification purposes Exhibit 9, Planning Director’s Exhibit 9 and also provisions of the Hawaiʽi County Code. Thank you. All right, Mr. Yeh? 12 EXHIBIT D