My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-04 Hearing Transcript - Arrow SPP 09-076 & Rodrigues SPP 15-178
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-02-04 Hearing Transcript - Arrow SPP 09-076 & Rodrigues SPP 15-178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2016 2:10:39 PM
Creation date
3/3/2016 2:10:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MIYASATO: Okay, and then, I guess my follow up to that is within that Ocean View <br />Subdivision, are the driveway entrances designated by the County in any way or can the <br />driveway be moved around somewhat? Where I’m going with it is that— <br /> <br />SELF: —Well, it’s private property so however they access the HOVE roads— <br /> <br />MIYASATO: —Okay, here’s my concern is that the Rodrigues’ property at the entrance is that <br />shear drop off and if you’re going to allow public access, and if they get out of their vehicle, you <br />know. <br /> <br />SELF: Well, it’s private property, so I don’t believe the County really has control over that. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, so the driveway can be moved. <br /> <br />SELF: Yes. <br /> <br />MIYASATO: Okay, thank you. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Commissioners, any other questions of the parties or counsel? Thank you <br />very much everyone. We previously closed public testimony on this matter. I’ve been made <br />aware of two other individuals who I understand are surrounding property owners that got here <br />after the public hearing portion of this trial was closed. They have asked for a reconsideration, <br />asked us to reopen and allow both of them to testify. I’m inclined to do it assuming my <br />colleagues are in agreement. I would ask for a motion to reopen public hearing for the limited <br />purposes of allowing, I believe Jan Dannel \[sic\] and Debbie Sheldon to testify in this matter. <br /> <br />HENKEL: I move to reopen public testimony for the two additional people. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Thank you, Commissioner Henkel. <br /> <br />MOSES: Second. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Thank you, Commissioner Moses. Any discussion, Commissioners? <br /> <br />MOSES: Three minutes. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Three minutes each. Hearing none, all those in favor, please signify by saying <br />aye. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Any opposition? All right, the motion to open public testimony for the limited <br />purposes of letting Jan or Jon Dannel \[sic\] and Debbie Sheldon testify carries. Thank you. I’d <br />ask Jan or Jon Dannel \[sic\] and Debbie Sheldon to please come up to the table. <br /> <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.