My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-07-08 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2015
>
2015-07-08 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2016 8:12:48 AM
Creation date
3/8/2016 3:11:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
secretary four copies. This is Ordinance 0857 Bill 209 draft 4, it's <br /> been languishing since for what eight years, seven years, and eight <br /> years. Seven years, it was signed by Mayor Kim on May 8, 2008. <br /> It is an Ordinance however it takes effect when this Board of <br /> Ethics, County of Hawai`i adopts this Ordinance into your Rules of <br /> Practice and Procedure. There will be a necessary amendment to <br /> the County Code through the Council legislature, because you will <br /> have to.. this County will have to form a Board of Appeals. This <br /> Ordinance gives you, this Board the right, you don't have to, but <br /> you may find every officer found in violation of the County Code <br /> of Ethics up to one-thousand dollars of each violation. That's only <br /> officers, that's not lower employees. You don't have to find them, <br /> but it gives you right to fine them and I do also suggest that there <br /> be a legislation which would create and this could be controversial, <br /> but you would be able to create a fine for on petitioners. Whether <br /> they be private sector or whether they be County employees or <br /> officers that bring absolutely frivolous petitions before this Board <br /> with absolutely no substantive content and/or evidence. It doesn't <br /> mean that if you rule against the petitioner, you could fine them. It <br /> doesn't mean that. There are two attorneys I'm looking at right <br /> here and you two people can figure out the legalese to clean up and <br /> make my statement more pertinent. Confidentiality that's one <br /> point one two of your Rules of Practice and Procedure due to the <br /> fact that this is a clumsy thing that the contents and the hard copy <br /> of the petitions are kept from our view until after we testify, <br /> because you haven't reviewed it yet. This is cumbersome and this <br /> creates a barrier to testifiers such as myself to be able to testify in a <br /> very clean and clarifying way. We can't see the petition yet. <br /> We're testifying about these petitions. All we can testify about are <br /> what is printed in the agenda and I feel that the matter, the amount <br /> of information in the agenda does not match the requirements of <br /> the Sunshine Law. Because it doesn't give us enough information. <br /> So it's something you could look into. The only exemption to that <br /> would be if the petitioner agrees and request a closed hearing, I'm <br /> referring to open hearings. That's it. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Thank you very much. <br /> 5) Gregory T. Smith (Hilo) signed up to testify on agenda items 4b, 4d, and 6d. <br /> Mr. Smith: Good morning. Aloha Council. <br /> Ms. Kahakalau: Could you please. <br /> Mr. Smith: My name is Gregory T. Smith, resident of Puna. Talking about the <br /> discussion or the petition about the good doctor here. Totally, <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.