My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-10 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-02-10 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2016 3:15:21 PM
Creation date
3/8/2016 3:15:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
provide a little bit more detail criteria and basis of selection. And <br /> the third document, is a copy of District 5 contingency relief fund <br /> resolution 375-16 submitted January 12, 2016 and adopted <br /> February 3, 2016. Resolution 268-15 was introduced by Council <br /> member Greggor Ilagan. I did vote in favor of the resolution, was <br /> subsequently adopted. The decision and the disposition of our <br /> stepping up application is expected February 19, 2016. But may <br /> be delayed due to the extension of the application deadline. And I <br /> believe the date of application is on the application, the copy of the <br /> application itself. Just a little background, the stepping up <br /> initiative is a program administered and supported by NACo and <br /> the Psychiatric Association. I guess the basic question is if the <br /> travel stipend that would be offered to our....if our application is <br /> accepted and selected. Would that fall under the definition of a <br /> gift? When I do look at the Ethics Code under Section 2-82 <br /> definitions. Unfortunately, there is no definition of a gift,but <br /> there is a section that relates to gifts in 2-91.4. Okay. Another <br /> question I would have is if the travel stipend falls under definition <br /> of a gift, then I'm kind of questioning on travel accord. <br /> Transportation compensation received by Council members who <br /> participate in NACo events, then those would also...I'm kind of <br /> concerned cause those would also be construed to. I would maybe <br /> perceive this as gifts. Furthermore, contingency funds resolution <br /> 375-16 was introduce and approved subsequent or after the <br /> Stepping Up Initiative Summit Application was submitted. Not to <br /> mention the motivation to participate in the Stepping Up Initiative <br /> is not predicated on the travel stipend, but rather to reduce the <br /> incidents of recidivism of persons with mental illness within our <br /> correctional facilities. The travel stipend would be granted to the <br /> team and not solely for the introducer of the resolution. Therefore, <br /> my belief that this section regarding conflicts of interest would <br /> seem more applicable. The purpose of the travel is to attend the <br /> summit and receive training on proper implementation of the <br /> initiative in our County. If you have any questions, let me add if <br /> the Board would rather entertain the premise that the gift section 2- <br /> 91.4 is more also relevant than I would like to amend the petition <br /> to also consider that section if that is possible. I'm not aware of <br /> the procedure. The application process considers the answers to <br /> specific questions and is a competitive process, although <br /> preference is given to applicants who have adopted resolutions <br /> supporting the Stepping Up Initiative. In terms of influence, if <br /> we're going about influence of why we're doing this initiative. <br /> What has influence me to support and participate in this initiative <br /> is my years of service with the State of Hawai`i Department of <br /> Public Safety. And my experience first-hand in the incarceration <br /> of individuals suffering from mental illness who in my belief <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.