Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RODILLAS, F.: Condition D. <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: Yeah, Condition D says that the final subdivision map shall include the <br />15-foot future road widening. Does this body here have the authority to either leave that in or <br />take that out or do we discuss that at the Council level? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Jeff? <br /> <br />DARROW: The Planning Commission can make a recommendation, but the final authority <br />comes from the County Council. In regards to this, it’s our understanding that with the previous <br />rezoning that occurred, that was a requirement and a part of the subdivision that occurred, the 15- <br />foot future road widening setback was already placed upon that subdivision. Correct? Which is <br />already identified on the current subdivision map for this property. So, we’re just asking that it <br />be, with this new subdivision that occurs, that it remains. <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: Okay, ‘cause I don’t, maybe I’m looking at the wrong document, but <br />Ordinance 13-38 does not include the 15-foot setback which is the property right next door. <br /> <br />DARROW: Okay, that, I think was your— <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: —I’m confused— <br /> <br />DARROW: —your family. <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: Yeah. <br /> <br />DARROW: But, for yours, the first one, zero seven, let’s see which— <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: —Yeah, it was included and then— <br /> <br />DARROW: —Right— <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: —when they subdivided, they took it out. So now, are we putting it back in <br />again? <br /> <br />DARROW: No, when they subdivided the lower property, they, I think they asked to take it out. <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: Okay. <br /> <br />DARROW: So, again, I guess that could be a consideration at this time— <br /> <br />RODILLAS, M.: —Okay— <br /> <br />DARROW: —to take it out for the upper one. <br /> <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT C <br /> <br /> <br />