My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - County Council Bill 102 (Iida REZ 07-073)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - County Council Bill 102 (Iida REZ 07-073)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2016 1:59:48 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 1:59:46 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ARAI: And, just to clarify, because this is a Council initiated bill, we’re actually speaking <br />directly to the bill that was introduced by the County Council. It is not an applicant initiated <br />request. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Understood. <br /> <br />ARAI: So, that’s where the awkwardness occurs. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Yeah, understood, but if no one is going to be heard on that, I’m not sure if we <br />took it. We had a motion by Commissioner Ikeda to close public testimony; second by <br />Commissioner Moses. No discussion. All in favor, please signify by saying aye. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONERS: Aye. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Opposed? None. Motion to close public testimony carries. Commissioners, <br />a motion for action, please. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Is there—can I ask a question to the Director? <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Certainly. <br /> <br />IKEDA: Mr. Kanuha, I approved—or how shall I say—I agree with your suggestion. Do we <br />have to vote this down or could we approve and just eliminate his, you know, the option that he <br />doesn’t want to pay his, you know, the frontage, and just put in the offer options for pro rata <br />share? Because, I kind of agree with exactly what you’re stating, and somehow, whatever came <br />out, wasn’t exactly, you know, as it stated, so maybe I have to ask Mr. Patel. Do we have to vote <br />this down and have the— <br /> <br />PATEL: Your recommendation can be whatever this Commission decides it wants it to be. So, <br />if it includes some of what the Director’s recommendation was and some, and deleting some of <br />what that recommendation was— <br /> <br />IKEDA: —Right— <br /> <br />PATEL: —You could do that. But, that would be by proper motion and vote— <br /> <br />IKEDA: —Okay— <br /> <br />PATEL: —of the Commission. <br /> <br />ARAI: Again, bear in mind that, sorry—bear in mind that the purpose of transmitting Bill 102 <br />down to you is to collect recommendations as well as comments so, again, it could be a specific <br />motion whether to go unfavorable as recommended by the Director of if you feel favorable, <br />that’s at your discretion. But, it could also include as you counsel suggested, the recommended <br /> <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.