My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Update Puna Pono Alliance et al GAF Claim
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Update Puna Pono Alliance et al GAF Claim
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2016 2:01:09 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 2:01:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Bringing this home to geothermal, people don’t seem to dismiss what were likely false <br />projections from the late seventies and early eighties that there was potentially 500 megawatts <br />available supposedly based on science. In the 35 years since, there have been numerous test <br />wells dug that turned out not to have enough potential, one failed pilot project, and the PGV <br />plant which for a brief period of time produced 38 megawatts but is permitted to produce up to <br />60. For the 500 megawatt number to prove true, there would need to be 13 more PGV’s <br />producing at the maximum level that they only achieved briefly. <br /> <br />If you want to be scientific, you had to base your facts on data and now that there is a reliable <br />data base, are they adjusting? Not to my knowledge. They are sticking with that 500 megawatt <br />number which was based on speculation. That makes me question science was ever a player in <br />the geothermal equation or is it strictly a clash of cultures—one that dictates where, where nature <br />is to be exploited when reasonably possible and the other that dictates that nature is to be revered <br />and man should maintain harmony. The latter bases their culture on centuries of living on these <br />islands while the other explains itself through false science that alters reality to justify its means. <br /> <br />At the beginning of geothermal development, thousands of people protested right by Hawaiians <br />but that energy has largely dissipated, but what is the result? On the obvious level, there has <br />been one huge blowout back in the 1990’s and many smaller ones that affected the health of the <br />immediate community. The plant has mostly produced a steady supply of baseload energy to the <br />grid but at what cost? There are some who have rebranded geothermal energy as Pele’s gift. If <br />that is a gift, then a thief that breaks your window and steals from you—is that considered a gift? <br />Or better yet, break some windows of many people’s homes, finally finds what he wants, even <br />then not all what he anticipated, but enough to go ahead and take that gift. That is a very giving <br />person who looks at that as a gift. In the process of justifying geothermal development, Pele has <br />been marginalized into being synonymous with, with lava when Pele is so much more. <br />Hawaiians have the right to stay true to their beliefs. The history of the last century and a half is <br />a cautionary tale that shows that the culture that grew from these islands is a culture that <br />understands these islands, and ignoring that reality has hurt the Hawaiians the most but everyone <br />who, who loves this place also suffers. <br /> <br />HEAUKULANI: Thank you, sir. Palikapu Dedman. <br /> <br />DEDMAN: Palikapu Dedman, Pele Defense Fund. I don’t wanna stand here and repeat myself. <br />You folks all know what’s going on. I just want to dialogue with the Planning Director on what <br />you gonna do about the situation. You guys all made a bunch of excuses. Now, how you’re <br />gonna remedy that? Your three minutes with me, dialogue, so everybody can understand where <br />we’re headed. So, what’s your answer on how we gonna deal with this situation? <br /> <br />KANUHA: I deal with the situation based on what the Commission’s decision is. How to use <br />the asset fund is—we got, I got nothing to do with that. <br /> <br />DEDMAN: I was going with the word, Director. So what do you direct? <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.