My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Update Puna Pono Alliance et al GAF Claim
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-03-03 Hearing Transcript - Update Puna Pono Alliance et al GAF Claim
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2016 2:01:09 PM
Creation date
4/7/2016 2:01:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
repairs around Puna. Neva run into no problems. Bam! Here is a fire station. Roads. <br />Recycling rubbish. No problem. Come to this—problem! <br /> <br />Yeah, I blame you. I think you should be taking care of the situation knowing most about it. So, <br />what’s your commitment to this, and how fast does it get done. <br /> <br />PATEL: If I can just interject real quick— <br /> <br />DEDMAN: —I just talking to him. I like his answer— <br /> <br />PATEL: —I understand. Let me just say what I’m going to— <br /> <br />DEDMAN: —You can interject after I get my answer— <br /> <br />PATEL: —Let me just say what I’m gonna say first, okay? This is not the forum to engage in <br />this kind of a dialogue. <br /> <br />DEDMAN: What dialogue? I’m asking a simple question. You one legal person trying to make <br />it a dialogue. Trying to look at some legal angle when it’s just up and up with this guy. That’s <br />all. Simple. <br /> <br />PATEL: Just stating for the record, this is not the forum. So, if—if you’re going to continue in <br />this at the Director’s and Chair’s leisure, that’s fine, but this is not the forum for that. <br /> <br />DEDMAN: If he wants to dialogue, it’s okay, yeah? <br /> <br />PATEL: That’s what I just said. <br /> <br />KANUHA: I don’t, I don’t have a problem dialoging with, with Pali, and you know again, the <br />way the, the way it’s set up now, is all of the claims gotta go through the claims adjuster, okay? <br />That’s, that’s the way it was set up. The claims adjuster does whatever he does and makes a <br />recommendation not to me, but he makes a recommendation to the Commission, okay? They <br />either take his recommendation or not. And, his recommendation is pretty specific because <br />the—once his recommendation is based upon whether or not the, the claim, right, meets the <br />requirements that’s gonna be able to pass procurement. You know, and I got, we got nothing to <br />do with the procurement side. If those requirements can’t be meet \[sic\], met, you know, even if <br />the Commission says, you know, we understand the claim, what the claims adjuster said, but you <br />know, we really think we want to do this and we’re finding out with this particular one, it’s just <br />not gonna pass procurement, you know. No matter how—the only way that can be—the only <br />way that can happen is the claim has to be reformatted, done whatever so that the claims adjuster <br />can look at it and say okay, this is good to go, you know. That’s—that’s the predicament, you <br />know, I’m in right now. <br /> <br />DEDMAN: For how long you think we gotta wait again? Another year? <br /> <br /> <br />13 <br />EXHIBIT E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.