My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-03-17 Leeward Exh B (REVOCATION OF USE 90)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-03-17 Leeward Exh B (REVOCATION OF USE 90)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2016 8:11:55 AM
Creation date
4/22/2016 8:11:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
BEAUDET: Thank you, staff. Any questions or comments for staff? Thank you. Next I’d like to <br />ask the applicant or its representative to please come forward. I’m sorry, not the applicant, but is <br />there a representative of ‘Āina Le‘a who would like to come forward? Okay, just for the record, <br />for the record there is no representation sitting here today for ‘Āina Le‘a Inc. <br /> <br />PATEL: And so, to be clear, there is no one here from ‘Āina Le‘a Inc. nor Bridge ‘Āina Le‘a, <br />LLC. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Mark that as no. <br /> <br />JACKSON: Mr. Chair, I’d just like to add a couple more things for the record since nobody is <br />here representing Bridge or ‘Āina Le‘a. The Planning Department did send out to Bridge via mail <br />and also email the agenda as well as the hearing notice, and we sent it by email because the <br />representatives of Bridge are in Saipan and they sent an email to us, letting us know that the mail <br />rd <br />is very slow, and they confirmed the receipt of the agenda on February 23 by email. We also <br />sent the background and recommendation report, and we sent the petition for standing in a <br />th <br />contested case hearing, and the petition was confirmed receipt by email on Marth 8. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: But there was no communication rather that they are okay — <br /> <br />JACKSON: There was no — <br /> <br />BEAUDET: — with the revocation or — <br /> <br />JACKSON: No, they never expressed their — <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Challenge or agreement. <br /> <br />JACKSON: — their opinion. Yeah. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Okay. Thank you. There has been no indication of a request for testimony. If there <br />is anyone in the audience who would like to come forward at this point, this would be your <br />opportunity. <br /> <br />Mr. Vitousek, I understand that you represent the Mauna Lani? <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Thank you, Mr. Chair and Members of the Commission. We petitioned to <br />intervene. Mauna Lani — <br /> <br />BEAUDET: We’re going to have to swear you in first. <br /> <br />VITOUSEK: Oh, sure. <br /> <br />BEAUDET: Do you swear now and before the Leeward Planning Commission to tell the truth on <br />this matter? <br /> <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.