My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-07 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership USE 16-061
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-04-07 Hearing Transcript - Cellco Partnership USE 16-061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2016 3:10:12 PM
Creation date
5/5/2016 3:10:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
KAY: Mr. Chair? I apologize. If I may, based on the decision not to grant standing, I did have <br />one other piece of, issue that I wanted to bring up. When we went out the other day to take <br />photographs of the subject parcel, we noticed a second driveway located on an adjacent parcel to <br />the subject parcel also owned by the same owners, the Yost's. It looks as though there was a <br />secondary driveway that connects to the driveway on the subject parcel, and it looks almost like <br />a turnaround. We wanted to be very clear and ask Verizon to state on the record that access to <br />the tower would only be through the subject parcel and not the adjacent parcel. I spoke with <br />Verizon's representative this morning, and they stated it was their intention to always do that, but <br />in the application, it wasn't stated clearly, so just to make sure that we have all our "I's" dotted <br />and "T's" crossed, I wanted to bring that up. <br />HEAUKULANL Thank you, Christian. <br />KAY: Thank you. <br />HEAUKULANL Anything further, sir? <br />BEASON: I can confirm that, that is the case. We're going to use the subject parcel for access <br />and follow the requirements of the Fire Department which were quite lengthy. I think I'd just <br />add on we've, Verizon has made an effort to design a tower that can provide co -location without <br />being too tall, which is always a balance between how many carriers can we fit for co -location <br />should somebody else come along, and also not so high that it's, it's even taller than what's <br />proposed, and, of course, the tree pole. That's an upfront proposal by Verizon. It's a much more <br />expensive project because of that, but we feel it's important for the aesthetics in Hawaii. <br />Thank you. <br />HEAUKULANL Thank you. Have you received the Planning Director's Background Report <br />and Recommendation Reports? <br />BEASON: Yes, I have. <br />HEAUKULANL All right. Do you agree with the Recommendation? <br />BEASON: Yes. <br />HEAUKULANL Any—any further comments regarding the Background Report or the <br />Recommendations? <br />BEASON: No, I don't think so. <br />HEAUKULANL And you've reviewed the list of proposed conditions? <br />BEASON: Yes, I have. <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.