Laserfiche WebLink
Case No. <br />21936 <br />TMK 7-7-004-035-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21937 <br />TMK 7-8-001-001-0000 <br />BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21938 <br />TMK 7-8-001-001-0000 <br />BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21939 <br />TMK 7-8-001-002-0000 <br />BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21940 <br />TMK 7-8-001-002-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21941 <br />TMK 7-8-001-003-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21942 <br />TMK 7-8-001-003-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21943 <br />TMK 7-8-001-007-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21944 <br />TMK 7-8-004-003-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21945 <br />TMK 7-8-004-034-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21946 <br />TMK 7-8-009-013-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21947 <br />TMK 7-8-009-019-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21997 <br />TMK 7-8-009-035-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />Case No. <br />21948 <br />TMK 7-8-009-038-0000 <br />B P BISHOP ESTATE <br />A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Church moved to accept the withdrawals as presented. Seconded by Mr. Dinges. <br />A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 4:0. <br />SETTLEMENTS — 9:OOA APPEALS AGENDA <br />County presented to the Board a 1 -page Appeals Agenda containing information on two (2) <br />cases that had reached settlement agreements between the County and the respective <br />appellants. A copy of the agenda is attached hereto as Exhibit A. <br />Mr. David questioned the land value in Case No. 21989. County appraiser Rex Jitchaku <br />responded. <br />A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Church moved to approve the settlements. Seconded by Mr. David. A call for <br />discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of 4:0. <br />Recessed: 10:55 a.m. <br />Reconvened: 1:30 p.m. <br />SETTLEMENTS — 1:30P APPEALS AGENDA <br />County presented to the Board a 1 -page Appeals Agenda containing information on three (3) <br />cases that had reached settlement agreements between the County and the respective <br />appellants. A copy of the agenda is attached hereto as Exhibit B. <br />Mr. David questioned the exemption amount in Case No. 21922. County appraiser Jaime <br />Ortiz Nava responded. <br />3 <br />