Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. D'Amico moved to deny the homeowner's exemption for the first half of the year <br />based upon the County Ordinance. Seconded by Mr. Church. A call for discussion <br />was made. Motion passed by a vote of 3:0 with Mr. David recused. <br />CASE #20774, 20776 & 20777 — SAN DUSKY, GEORGE <br />TMK 7-6-014-018-0000, 7-6-014-019-0000 & 7-6-014-020-0000 <br />Present were appellant George Sandusky and County appraiser Ellsworth Hulihee. <br />Property located on Heenalu Road east of Alii Drive. <br />Appeal on land value. <br />Appellant presented his case. County presented their case and recommended reducing the <br />land value to $194,900. A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Church moved to reschedule the case to allow the County time to review the <br />information provided by the appellant for parcel 18. Seconded by Mr. Kualii. A call for <br />discussion was made. After discussion, Mr. Church withdrew his motion and Mr. <br />Kualii withdrew his second. <br />Mr. Church moved to sustain the County's value for parcel 18. Seconded by Mr. <br />Kualii. A call for discussion was made. After discussion it was requested that Case <br />Nos. 20776 and 20777 be incorporated into the current presentation of Case No. 20774. <br />Appellant presented his case. County presented their case. A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Church moved to amend his motion to sustain the County's value for parcels 18, <br />19 and 20. Seconded by Mr. David. A call for discussion was made. After discussion, <br />Mr. Church withdrew his motion and Mr. David withdrew his second. <br />Mr. Church moved to reduce parcel 18 to $100,000, reduce parcel 19 to $100,000 and <br />sustain parcel 20 at $411,100. Seconded by Mr. David. A call for discussion was <br />made. Motion passed by a vote of 4:0 <br />CASE #20766 — STENBERG, DAN <br />TMK 8-2-008-016-0000 <br />Present were appellant Dan Stenberg and County appraiser Matthew Radmilovic. <br />Property located on lower Napoopoo Road. <br />Appeal on property class. <br />Appellant presented his case. County presented their case and recommended reducing the <br />land value to $282,000 and building value to $1,276,300. A call for questions was made. <br />5 <br />