Laserfiche WebLink
County presented their case together with any and all information provided <br />by the appellant. County recommended sustaining the assessed values. <br />A call for questions was made. <br />Mr. Murata moved to sustain the assessed values. Seconded by Mr. <br />Takai. A call for discussion was made. Motion passed by a vote of <br />5:0 <br />• October 6 pg. 4 Case No. 13016, third paragraph, second <br />sentence reads: ".....by changing the property <br />class from 5 to 4 and sustaining....." <br />Correction: "... by changing the building class from 5 to 4 and <br />sustaining..." <br />• October 6 pg. 6 Case No. 12670, third paragraph, second <br />sentence reads: "Seconded by Mr. Takai" <br />Correction: "Seconded by Mrs. Ford." <br />• August 19 pg. 4 Case No. 12527, fifth paragraph, first sentence <br />reads: "Mr. Takai moved to reduce the <br />assessed building value to $850,000 and land <br />value to $638,500." <br />Correction: "Mr. Takai moved to reduce the assessed value to $850,000 <br />with building value at $638,500 and sustain the land." <br />• October 7 pg. 6 Case No. 13065, first paragraph, second <br />sentence reads: "Present was Mr. McCall on <br />behalf of County appraiser Mark Cutler." <br />Correction: "Present was Mr. McCall on behalf of County appraiser Elaine <br />Yoshizumi." <br />Mrs. Ford moved to accept the minutes of August 18, 19, 25 and 26, September <br />1, 2, 8, 9, 22 and 23, October 6, 7, 13, 14, 27 and 28, and November 3 as <br />corrected. Seconded by Mr. Murata. A call for discussion was made. Motion <br />passed by a vote of 3:0. <br />OLD BUSINESS: No old business discussed. <br />2 <br />