My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-21 Leeward Exh D (Amend REZ 1020)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-04-21 Leeward Exh D (Amend REZ 1020)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2016 3:59:22 PM
Creation date
5/19/2016 3:59:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
owned several other properties on Kalawa Street; it was his understanding that there wasn’t a <br />setback requirement for that, and now there is a setback requirement for his property he is <br />applying for. And according to the Planning Department, there is a four-foot setback. <br /> <br />KAY: That is correct. Okay, so, the initial ordinance back in 2003 a req-, because that was <br />changing from Multi-Family Residential to Commercial zoning, and because of the designation of <br />the street as a secondary arterial, I believe, the requirement was to widen the road. So they <br />actually said widen the pavement, add curb, gutter, sidewalk, at that point. So that was the <br />original requirement, condition under the original ordinance. When he came back in for the time <br />extension, Public Works looked at that and said in order to kind of be consistent with the curb, <br />gutter, sidewalk and the pavement width with the adjacent commercial parcel, instead of widening <br />so you would have a jog in putting it in, they said go ahead and be consistent with the pavement <br />width, curb, gutter, sidewalk, to your next door parcel, and then just set aside a five-foot road <br />widening setback so that should in the future Public Works decide to widen the road, that they <br />would be able to do so within the five-foot setback. Did that answer your question? <br /> <br />UNGER: Yeah. <br /> <br />KAY: Okay. <br /> <br />UNGER: Also, just a parking question, and I think Mr. Fine is here to testify, but in regard to the <br />letter he’s sent to the Planning Department, I mean, if we are all familiar with this area, parking is <br />an issue. I did notice that there are two parking stalls per apartment; I didn’t see any parking for <br />the commercial kitchen or the eating area. Is there additional parking required for that, or how is <br />that being addressed? <br /> <br />KAY: So based on these plans, given the square footage of the proposed development, it would <br />meet the code requirement, the code requirement for parking stalls. These are just preliminary <br />plans, so he’d still have to go through the Plan Approval process at which point, should he change <br />his plans between now and then, we take a look at it and require the appropriate amount of parking <br />for the code <br /> <br />UNGER: Okay. Thank you. <br /> <br />KAY: You’re welcome. <br /> <br />UNGER: Any other questions? <br /> <br />CHURCH: No. <br /> <br />UNGER: Thank you. <br /> <br />KAY: Thank you. <br /> <br />UNGER: If the applicant can come forward at this time. Please raise your right hand. Do you <br />swear and affirm to tell the truth before the Planning Commission? <br /> <br />SUNDQUIST: Yes, I do. <br />3 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.