Laserfiche WebLink
o People interested in particular issues <br />• Assumptions <br />o Keep it user-friendly — avoid formal meeting and testimony format <br />o Vary times and locations <br />o "Executive Summary" level of detail is appropriate for most <br />o A small number may want a more detailed explanation and discussion (similar to <br />SC review) <br />o Options for providing feedback: verbal, written, online <br />o Allow enough time but don't drag it out (e.g., 8 weeks) <br />• Proposed Elements <br />o Copies of CDP available in hard copy and on web, including the rationale for each <br />strategy <br />o "Speak outs" in Papa`ikou, Laupahoehoe, Honoka`a <br />■ Mornings and/or afternoons on Saturdays <br />o "Focused Discussions" <br />■ Organized and publicized by the County <br />■ Pre -scheduled and publicized time for each topic <br />o Participation in meetings organized by others, by request <br />Mr. Agres asked the Steering Committee if they thought agriculture, economic development, <br />and coastal protection would be appropriate topics for the focus meetings and asked for <br />additional suggestions. Mr. Carvalho suggested Public Access and Mr. Kurokawa suggested <br />Rural Character. Mr. Agres assured the SC that this discussion would be on-going throughout <br />the process. The committee took a quick break and returned to continue the discussion on the <br />community review process. Mr. Agres continued with the proposed approach to community <br />review of the Draft CDP by discussing speak outs and publicity tools: <br />• Speak Outs <br />o "start here"/overview station <br />o Other stations by topic/area <br />o Stations include <br />■ Written summaries (e.g., from Executive Summary) <br />■ Visual images (e.g., timeline, pie graphic, maps) <br />■ Resources person & recorder <br />o No presentation <br />SC members suggested having a "drop box" for comments, possibly at libraries or community <br />centers, also the possibility of adding a more technology based outreach. Also important to <br />reach the elderly community who may not be able to attend the speak outs, or may not feel <br />comfortable speaking in large groups. Mr. Agres suggested identifying specific groups for <br />focused discussion. Mr. Agres went on to speak about the potential publicity tools that would <br />be used to generate public attendance and asked the SC for additional ideas. <br />• Publicity Tools <br />o Web site <br />o Email <br />o Facebook <br />o Hamakua Times <br />o Community Association Newsletters <br />Page 14 <br />