Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCTION OF NEW CDP TEAM ROLES: <br />Ms. Gloor announced that with Mr. Kay moving over to the Planning Commission side of the Planning <br />Department, she is now the Lead Planner for the Hamakua CDP and that Ms. Mercado has come on <br />board as of January 2015 as the Community Planning Assistant (CPA). <br />PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: None <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />Ms. Mendoza noted that the third paragraph should be changed to read "Mr. Kay clarified that the Plan <br />does not move toward adoption until..." <br />Mr. Kurokawa moved to accept the minutes as amended by Ms. Mendoza. Second by Ms. Mendoza. <br />Motion passed with 5 votes aye and 0 votes nay. <br />BUSINESS: <br />CDP Update: Ms. Gloor provided an update on the status of the CDP project including: <br />a. Timeline & Next Steps in the CDP Process <br />b. Internal Review Process <br />Ms. Gloor explained that the Draft CDP is currently going through an internal review where the <br />draft is being revised based on comments received. This internal review is leading to a much <br />stronger CDP draft. Both language and policy are being tightened up and the result will be well <br />worth the time spent on it. Once the draft is complete, it will then be ready for review by the <br />Steering Committee. There will be two phases to the review process. During Phase 1, the Steering <br />Committee will review preliminary strategies, gain a complete understanding of the contents of the <br />Draft CDP and identify key questions, concerns and informational needs. The Steering Committee <br />will have an opportunity to suggest changes and provide comment on the Draft CDP. The desired <br />outcome of Phase 1 is for the Steering Committee to affirm that the Draft CDP is ready for <br />Community review. This phase will provide the Steering Committee with the tools and <br />understanding they will need to move successfully through Phase 2. Phase 2 is the opportunity for <br />the Community to review the Draft CDP. The draft CDP will be revised based on Community <br />feedback and will then be recommended as the "preferred CDP". The Preferred CDP will then be <br />reviewed by the Planning Commission and sent on to the County Council. <br />2. Discussion — Upcoming Steering Committee Review of the initial CDP Draft: Ms. Gloor <br />explained several different ways the Steering Committee might be able to schedule time to review <br />the draft CDP during phase 1. Ms. Gloor also gave a brief overview of what the workshops might <br />be like. Discussion ensued and it was determined that the Steering Committee would prefer to <br />meet for a few full days and half days as needed. Steering Committee members expressed their <br />interest in starting these workshops in the morning rather than the afternoons. They agreed that it <br />would be easier to absorb content that is presented fluidly and completely, rather than in several <br />small chunks. Each Steering Committee member filled out a form providing dates that they <br />already know they are unavailable. Based on the dates provided, several possible dates will be <br />presented to Steering Committee members. <br />PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS: None <br />EVALUATION OF THE FEBRUARY 3, 2015 MEETING: <br />Mr. Carvalho expressed his frustration of meetings starting late due to tardiness of Steering <br />Committee members. He suggested changing the times of the meetings if members are unable to <br />make the current meeting start time of 5:00 pm. Mr. Carvalho also believes that moving the <br />meeting time a little later might allow for more members of the public to attend. Ms. Gomes <br />