Laserfiche WebLink
In my opinion, to change the zoning in any other lots in that neighborhood would be a mistake <br />because the one that was already changed and the reason for it has already been negated, and to <br />change the nature of the neighborhood without a compelling reason is just wrong, and to go—the <br />house that was changed, they stipulated that they had to maintain the character and the <br />appearance of the original house, which I think was a good thing, that they at least did that. <br />Well, if they put in office buildings then that's gonna change the nature of the neighborhood <br />further and it's kind of doubly wrong. I think it was wrong to make the change on the last house, <br />and I think it would be even a bigger mistake to make this change on this house on these three <br />lots. <br />If the zoning is just changed whenever anybody wants to, it kind of means that people can't trust <br />that their zoning means anything. It becomes meaningless. It's just changed because somebody <br />feels like they want to change it. <br />In my opinion, Manono Street is an excellent location for residential. We looked, 20 years ago <br />we bought there, and we looked at several different properties, and this is centrally located in the <br />middle of everything, and it's accessible to everything and fairly close distance, and it's just an <br />excellent neighborhood for residents, and to change it doesn'tI don't like the idea of changing <br />it. I think it's wrong to change it, and I think you're kind of cutting off your nose to spite your <br />face if you do because, I mean, for so many different reasons. There's the fact that having <br />residential areas in the center of things cuts down on commuting. It cuts down on time and so <br />it's more efficient. So, it's good for the environment, less gas usage. We've got a housing crisis <br />to where there's a lot of homelessness and itcutting down the number of residential lots <br />available is, you know, making it harder, you know, increasing the problems of homelessness. <br />It's, you know, environmentally, economically, there are a whole bunch of different reasons that <br />just doesn't make sense to me to change zoning in this area. And, so I object to it, and I would <br />like to see that not done. I don't see any really compelling reason to do it. <br />I think that wraps up what I had to say. <br />HEAUKULANL Thank you, sir. Ma'am? <br />RHOADES, G.: Hi, good morning. <br />HEAUKULANL Good morning. <br />RHOADES, G.: My name is Gail Rhoades, spouse to Lou Rhoades. I live at 1045 Manono <br />Street, which is one property over from where the office buildings are proposed, and I'm just <br />amazed that you would even consider putting three more office buildings in that neighborhood. <br />On East Kawili, just north or east of the brewery, there's a brand new office building that was <br />built two years ago, and it has not had a single occupant. It's all boarded up. It's an eyesore. <br />And, as you know, driving around town, there are many buildings that are empty waiting for <br />occupancy. I believe there is no need for three additional office buildings especially on Manono. <br />The traffic is bad enough now. <br />5 <br />EXHIBIT C <br />