My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
SpeakOut Comments - Raw
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Public Comment/Feedback on Draft Hamakua CDP
>
SpeakOut Comments - Raw
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2016 3:47:01 PM
Creation date
6/3/2016 3:46:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Draft H -am akua CDP <br />Community SpeakOuts <br />April g, 2o16 / April 23, 2o16 / May 7, 2o16 <br />Eucalyptus trees need to be taken care of - what is the plan? Just going to grow back? - KS land - <br />Fire danger <br />"No ... anything that blocks the view of mountains and ocean" is unrealistic - related to forests: before <br />there were natural forests. <br />Access issues are always a concern. Park development at Ha'ina Landing - historic Pa'ahau Mill Site: <br />is clean up necessary? Comes with time. <br />Recycling access - carbon footprint by driving <br />Need space for recreation activities like regional park - space to bike, jog, etc. - Utilize open space <br />for community to gather. <br />Shoreline setback - Coast should be public; Rivers should be too- access; Language saying "Have to <br />have an access trail.." <br />Laupahoehoe scenic lookout - Plantings (landscaping) are blocking view. Public Lookout but Private <br />Land - what can County do? Viewplane next to scenic lookout be preserved by keeping all plantings <br />no higher than rooflines - Kona ruling on private covenant was ruled in favor of limiting plantings to <br />roof) i ne. <br />Keep Waipi'o protected as it is & allow public access, even if it gets sold. <br />Partnership - i.e. Gov't & NGO (like Nature Conservancy) to determine possible future. <br />How can Waipi'o manage the threat to the valley of things like dengue, etc? (Tourists bringing <br />threats into valley) <br />Re: Non -conforming Ag Land use: How can we ensure people don't misuse this and not have <br />stronger consequences? Small fines for big over -steps is not acceptable. <br />How do we manage the "overuse" of the valley? Possibly having to limit access? <br />In other places, people got together, purchased the lands & put it in a trust to assure perpetuity. <br />Maybe that can happen here - either privately, in partnerships, or by the State. <br />Maybe we can set up a lending bank/loan fund to be accessed by the people who work the land & <br />want to buy from Bishop Museum (the land they already steward). <br />Leave decision up to the people of the valley <br />County and/or State should fund the portable toilets by the beach and located on K.S. Land to <br />support public access to the beach. <br />Critical for the current residents/farmers to speak with "one voice" before actions can proceed. <br />Agriculture <br />■ Partner with NHERC on Resource Preservation <br />Be able to live on your farm land in an economical way <br />Need cohesive definitions between Tax & Planning Departments about what is agriculture & some <br />way to enforce it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.