My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
HAMAKUA CDP MEMO v4 - redacted
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Public Comment/Feedback on Draft Hamakua CDP
>
HAMAKUA CDP MEMO v4 - redacted
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 2:08:47 PM
Creation date
6/22/2016 2:08:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The CDP cites Factors 3 and 4 to sunnort "'faking Aarcel 055 out of LUP": <br />Factor 3: Align with State Land Use District Boundary. The third factor in developing LUPAG <br />recommendations is BASED ON THE COMMUNITY'S OBJECTIVE #5, which states: "Direct future <br />settlement patterns that are sustainable and connected. Honor Hamakua's historic and cultural assets by <br />concentrating new development in existing, walkable, mixed-use town centers while limiting rural sprawl." <br />Factor 4: Align with County zoning [land use]. The fourth factor in developing LUPAG recommendations is <br />BASED ON THE COMMUNITY'S OBJECTIVE #5, which states: "Direct future settlement patterns that <br />are sustainable and connected. Honor Hdmdkua's historic and cultural assets by concentrating new <br />development in existing, walkable, mixed-use town centers while limiting rural sprawl." <br />*COMMENT: If you visit Kihalani Homestead Road (depending on weather) you will see <br />people walking, pushing strollers, running, biking and doing other "walkable" and other <br />sustainable and connected activities on the road far above Parcel 055 (Parcel 055 is only 4/10 <br />of a mile from the Laupahoehoe "town center". And the road connects with our commercial <br />district and high school. <br />*COMMENT: As for "rural sprawl" in Kihalani Homestead, in my 12 years in Laupahoehoe I <br />have never heard the word "sprawl" or anything like it applied to Laupahoehoe. If the <br />Laupahoehoe community is not concerned with "sprawl", who is? If sprawl exists in <br />Laupahoehoe it is in a form that has been part of the homestead for decades as far as to the top <br />of Kihalani Homestead Road which people here just call "home". Any "sprawl" in <br />Laupahoehoe, be it peoples' homes or their gardens, has also been present for decades; so it is a <br />little late to be "limiting" it. <br />*COMMENT: What "parcel specific" considerations were used? What "parcel specific" data <br />was used? If the "parcel specific" considerations were based on aerial photography kindly <br />consider that Google Earth only updates images every two or three years. All the LDU parcels <br />on Kihalani Homestead Road currently designated LDU have been, and still are, serving LDU <br />functions. There is no reason to change the current LDU designations on Kihalani Homestead <br />Road. <br />*COMMENT: The rest of the policies cited do not appear to be relevant to LDU in <br />Laupahoehoe on Kihalani Homestead Road but are listed as part of the LDU issue in order to <br />respond to each "rationale". <br />The rationale cites Policy 2 to support "Taking parcel 055 out of LUP": <br />Policy 2 <br />New urban development shall be located away from coastal areas and the Special Management Area. This is <br />reflected in the location of "Low Density Urban" (LDU) areas on the official Land Use Policy Map. Rationale: <br />To further Community Objectives #1 and #2 in guiding development, a review of the current land uses and <br />designations in coastal areas was performed and changes are recommended in areas not yet developed but <br />have LUPAG designations that guide future development to this coastal area. Recommendations are made in <br />these undeveloped coastal areas to protect the shoreline as open space and priority viewsheds whenever <br />possible. The exceptions to this are when coastal areas are already designated within the State Land Use <br />Urban District and/or are already County -zoned for residential or commercial uses. See Factor 1 from Policy 1, <br />above. This policy is consistent with existing General Plan Policy 8.3 (d), "Protect the shoreline from the <br />encroachment of man-made improvements and structures" and (HRS 205A-2(c)(3(D)), "Encourage those <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.