Laserfiche WebLink
Climate: <br />Mean annual rainfall is 122 inches (mean January = 11.8 inches, mean July = 9.5 <br />inches). Mean annual temperature is 71 OF (mean January = 68.8°F, mean July = <br />73.5 °F). <br />Water: <br />High water holding capacity. Fast permeability. Soil is moist for majority of the year. <br />Little chance for runoff and erosion, but both increase as slope increases in steepness. <br />Fertility: <br />Naturally infertile (Fertility Class=Infertile Andisols). Low nutrient holding capacity. <br />Often deficient in calcium, magnesium, and potassium. However, with proper nutrient <br />amendment, it can be productive. Surface layers are rich in organic matter. <br />Phosphorous: <br />Very high phosphorus reactivity. Strongly "fixes" phosphorus, making added <br />phosphorus initially unavailable to plants. Requires very high phosphorus additions to <br />compensate. <br />Acidity: <br />Strongly acidic to near neutral (pH = 5.1 - 6.5) Acidity expected to increase if have <br />history of plantation agriculture (i.e. sugarcane, pineapple). May require liming when <br />intensively farmed. <br />Structure: <br />Weak physical structure provides fluffy texture, making cultivation easy, but provides <br />unsuitable conditions for engineering and construction. Engineering and cultivation <br />also unsuitable on steeper slopes. (class C even on level land) <br />Taxonomy: <br />Medial over hydrous, amorphic, isohyperthermic Acrudoxic Hydrudands <br />http:H/ zis.ctahr.hawaii.edu/SoilAtlas <br />2E. Burdens of IAL: A change to IAL for parcel 055 comes with increased land use burdens <br />imposed retroactively; and a likely loss of property value due to the strict regulation (note that <br />this would be in addition to the current County effort to repeal non -dedicated agricultural <br />exemptions and to impose acreage minimums). A change to IAL would therefore cause Parcel <br />055 an "unreasonable economic hardship" which cannot be prevented. Thus parcel 055 should <br />be continued in a LDU designation. An alternative would be to change the LUPAG for parcel <br />055 to "Rural" (see also the conclusion of these comments for another possible land use <br />category). Designating a small farm for IAL could actually hurt the chances of any kind of <br />agriculture being conducted. Although incentives are supposed to support the IAL program, <br />these incentives are may not apply to micro or small farms. The regulations of IAL might result <br />in long fallow periods. The burdens might be offset to some extent from having pre -IAL <br />grandfathered uses. <br />2F. IAL Can Affect Land Values: Using parcel 055 as an example: with a $250,000 purchase <br />price for 3.9 acres of land, the cost per acre is apx. $64,000 per acre (not counting the farming <br />on <br />