My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Kamehameha Schools Comments on Draft HCDP
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Community Development Plans (CDP)
>
Hamakua Community Development Plan
>
Public Comment/Feedback on Draft Hamakua CDP
>
Kamehameha Schools Comments on Draft HCDP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2016 2:13:47 PM
Creation date
6/22/2016 2:13:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Duane Kanuha <br />Re: Comments from Kamehameha Schools to Draft HCDP (Jan. 2016) <br />June 15, 2016 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />CDP with an average lot depth of two hundred feet or less, <br />the shoreline setback line shall be 40 feet. <br />The development of a countywide coastal setback policy should take into account <br />the unique geologic, geographic, topographic, and coastal conditions along the Hamakua <br />coast. In addition, regarding setback regulations based on the proposed 1:1 horizontal to <br />vertical concept, more information and data is required to determine the efficacy and <br />implications of basing regulations on such concept. Moreover, Policy 19 raises additional <br />questions and comments, for example: <br />• Does Policy 19 apply to riparian or riverine areas? KS understands that the <br />County is working on a separate policy addressed to riverine setbacks. Policy <br />19 is unclear that the policy is meant only for coastal areas, and not both <br />coastal and riverine areas. To avoid potentially conflicting policies, the County <br />should include language in Policy 19 clarifying that the policy does not apply to <br />riparian or riverine areas, and should expressly limit its application to coastal <br />areas. <br />• Policy 19 provides two methods (i.e., methods A and B) for establishing the <br />setback. Policy 19, however, does not define who (or what agency) determines <br />which method is used and when one method should or would be used over the <br />other. The lack of definition creates uncertainty. For example, does the County <br />intend permit approval to be contingent on the use of the more restrictive <br />method ? <br />• Method A of Policy 19 is based on a 1:1 ratio of vertical cliff height to a <br />horizontal setback. The Draft HCDP Rationale does not support this specific <br />formula, and the County has not provided references to additional data <br />regarding this concept. <br />• KS understands the County is working on defining certain technical and <br />material terms affecting Policy 19 and other policies, such as "toe of slope" and <br />"top of Pali." Until these terms are defined, the implications and impact of <br />Policy 19 cannot be fully assessed. KS reserves the right to supplement its <br />comments to Policy 19 pending the County's finalization of such terms and <br />definitions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.