2016-06-02 Hearing Transcript - Mile Marker 12 SPP 16-189

Home

that kind of stuff, so please support this. It's a great thing. There's a lot of those going on out there. Thank you. HEAUKULANL Thank you, sir. Commissioners well, let me check one more timeanyone else would like to be heard on this matter? All right. Commissioners, can I get a motion to close public testimony? HENKEL: I move to close public testimony. HEAUKULANL Thank you, Commissioner Henkel. IKEDA: Second. HEAUKULANL Second from Commissioner Ikeda. DARROW: Mr. Chairman? HEAUKULANL Oh, excuse me. DARROW: Sorry to interrupt. Could I propose a change to our conditions? HEAUKULANL Sure. DARROW: Thank you. In response to Commissioner's, Commissioner Clarkson's concerns, we'd like to make a change to Condition 6, and the change would be as follows. It, the new condition will state, "The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the State Department of Health for compliance with [the] wastewater system(s)" and we are adding, ", the proposed potable water, and the certified kitchen." And then further on, "The applicant shall have an engineer submit revised wastewater plans for the new wastewater system and comply with Chapter 50 (Food Safety Code) for the certified kitchen" and then we would add "and adequate water requirements within one year from the effective date of the permit." We would also like to request that Condition 8 be deleted, and then the remainder be renumbered. Thank you. HEAUKULANL Okay, Commissioners, did everyone follow Jeff on the proposed revision to the conditions? Any questions? Any discussion? If the Applicant or the Applicants' representative—are they still? She's nodding her head. Sir—sir, did you hear what Jeff just said so it's a, we discussed it early on, and it's a revision to paragraph six of the conditions and deleting paragraph 8. LUND: Yes, I agree. HEAUKULANL It's acceptable to you? 13 EXHIBIT A