Laserfiche WebLink
And, the other thing II should emphasize, too, is that it's the temporal and spatial resolution <br />that is, is one of the real issues here. The, anything released at PGV could be into the community <br />within minutes, and so, this model has to be able to resolve those kinds of scales. In other words, <br />it, it can't be an hourly averaged model. It has to be something that will give us some idea of the <br />concentration over time, shorter time periods on the order of minutes, and shorter distances on <br />the order of several hundred meters. So, that's one of the things that we're gonna really look at <br />real hard is the ability of these models to give us the temporal and spatial resolution that is <br />required for this particular kind of application. <br />And the final thing I'd like to say is that, you know, we can do some pre -modelling. We can go <br />in and determine what conditions are the worst for dispersion. In other words, what conditions <br />are gonna give us the highest concentrations. And, we can model the heck out of that kind of <br />situation and then if we are, find ourselves in that sort of a situation, low wind speed, a strong <br />inversion lid, that sort of thing, then we know that we are in trouble, and we can react based on <br />what modelling we had done previously. So, that's one of the other things that I probably should <br />have said earlier. <br />PETRICCL I'd just like to add that your point is well taken. Basically, PGV is largely self- <br />regulating at this point. When there's a problem there, the Department of Health calls PGV and <br />says what's going on. And, so that's, we're gonna have to address that from, in a separate venue, <br />I think. We are, as Puna Pono Alliance, working on that and have been for quite a while. I hope <br />that helps clarify it but largely, Department of Health and even EPA delegate a lot of those things <br />to PGV to be self -reporting, and we need to change that as well. <br />HENKEL: Mr. Chair? <br />HEAUKULANL Commissioner Henkel. <br />HENKEL: Okay, I'm a layman. I'm wondering, is it possible to release inert materials at certain <br />times under different conditions to kind of map what's going to happen? <br />BUSINGER: That's a very prescient question, and actually it is part of the proposal. We're <br />going to release a non-toxic, very easily detectable gas that doesn't occur in nature, and we're <br />gonna sample it using a special technique called bagged sampling downwind, and that's how <br />we're going to validate the dispersion models that we, that we're going to run. And, we're going <br />to run two different dispersion models. One is a HYSPLIT Model which is continually evolving <br />and improving. It's, it's developed by, in NOAA, within NOAA, and the other model that we're <br />gonna look at is this CALPUFF Model. So, we're going to have two competing models, and the <br />CALPUFF Model is really excellent for close -in and very, very high resolution. <br />This is a state-of-the-art project, but it's definitely something which is doable because there are a <br />lot of circumstances in which there's pollution that's being released, say—say, a sarin gas that's <br />being released in a subway tunnel. Any of those kinds of circumstances have, have been <br />addressed using these kind of models. So, it is something which is doable. <br />9 <br />EXHIBIT C <br />