My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-10 Regular Session Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Corporation Counsel
>
Board of Ethics
>
Minutes
>
2011-2018
>
2016
>
2016-05-10 Regular Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2016 11:15:30 AM
Creation date
7/13/2016 11:15:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Adams: Thank you. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Mr. Murai do you have any comments? <br /> Mr. Murai: My understanding is this vote...an affirmative vote YES would <br /> clear the decks of any outstanding motions and put it back before <br /> the Board for the setting of an informal hearing or not. Is that <br /> correct? <br /> Mr. Goodenow: I think that's clear. <br /> Mr. Murai: That's my understanding too. <br /> Mr. Robinson: If I could just one question before we vote. What is the definition <br /> of disposition? <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Maybe we should save that for discussion. Any discussion? Now <br /> you can ask that. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Oh we had a motion. Has it been seconded? <br /> Mr. Adams: That's Rick. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Discussion. <br /> Mr. Murai: Well my own definition of a disposition would mean that the <br /> matters been concluded. In other words...it's been concluded by <br /> a...if we're speaking of criminal charges or an indictment. <br /> Disposition in my mind would be...holding of a hearing and a <br /> conviction or acquittal and the sentence if appropriate. In other <br /> words...the matter is pau. <br /> Mr. Robinson: Okay. Thank you. <br /> Mr. Goodenow: Is there any further discussion? Mr. Eddins...would you care to <br /> give us some input...I mean...I'11 throw in a little discussion now. <br /> If...I don't know if we can assume that...I think one of the <br /> concerns is the criminal case would continue beyond the Mayor's <br /> term of office and then at that point we would lose jurisdiction. I <br /> think that was expressed in a previous motion...discussion on this <br /> matter. I don't know at this point I still feel...there's a criminal <br /> case going on. I think it might be best not to interfere...let Mr. <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.