My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-19 Leeward Exh D (SPP 16-188)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2016
>
2016-05-19 Leeward Exh D (SPP 16-188)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/21/2016 3:48:35 PM
Creation date
7/21/2016 3:48:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
subdivision. And frankly, I think that’s probably a little low as far as estimates go, because we <br />are for the most part pretty blue collar subdivision. <br /> <br />I want to give you a little bit of my own credentials, because I’ve sat on your side, so I try to look <br />at these things objectively. My credentials are at this hearing is that before moving to this island <br />I was a member of the City of Santa Cruz’s planning commission, that’s in California, for 17 <br />years. I served both its chairman, vice chairperson and a member of the commission all those <br />times. The area I came from is very similar in many respects, except for the water temperature. <br />We dealt with water temperature of 65 degrees, so I stayed out of the water a little bit; your water <br />temperature is much better. But Santa Cruz is located on the Central Coast of California. Like <br />this area here, we had the Pacific to the west, mountains to the east, we were heavily dependent <br />on agriculture and tourism, we had a population of 52,000, and a university that brought an <br />additional 21,000 students to our university along with the support staff. The area I came from, <br />just as we are here, was a very environmentally conscious community, very much aware of our <br />natural resources, constantly aware of back growth and a need to manage the growth, looking <br />very closely at providing housing and a viable transportation system while accommodating an <br />economy that could support the residents of our community. Projects were brought before us, <br />our Santa Cruz City Council, or Santa Cruz City Planning Commission, and condition many <br />times taken into account sacred Ohlone Indian burial sites. We were also very conscious of the <br />need to reconcile industrial and residential zoning. We were always balancing those out, looking <br />at the effects of one upon the other. We were very careful to take into consideration these effects <br />and what it might have on the residential zoning. In my first years as a planning commissioner a <br />long time ago I often wondered how qualified was I really to make judgements about projects <br />before me. The language of planning was a bit overwhelming to me, because I’m sure Members <br />of this Planning Commission especially in their first year or two can understand, and I would ask <br />myself how qualified was I really to challenge the recommendations of the professional planning <br />staff. And I’m bringing that up in the context of the recommendation that was made by the <br />Planning staff. This is where public hearings and the observations and needs of the public are so, <br />so, so very important. Reconciling the state and needs of the public with the logic and rule <br />followed by planning staff really needs to trump everything else. We had, and you have, <br />guidelines to follow. But common sense was a big part of the decisions we made, and a big part <br />of your decision-making, I’m sure. <br /> <br />At Pualani Estates we walked our neighborhoods when we saw the special use permit coming up. <br />We asked homeowners and tenants what they thought of the proposed special use permit <br />application before you. There were many who did not understand the technicalities to the <br />applied-for permit, but what the overwhelming majority of the residents did understand was the <br />following, and I’m not exaggerating. You already heard about the noise; I won’t say more about <br />that. Residents were also concerned about the increase of dust in the air. This is what residents <br />kept repeating: Dust in the air from the quarry that existed before the stop order the end of <br />February has continued on even subsequent to that stop order. Residents don’t understand — <br />and I haven’t heard a whole lot of people talk about this part of it — how our current road system <br />can handle the truck traffic. Staff’s report states there could be ten to twenty truck loads per day. <br />I looked a little closer at that the way I used to look at things when I had things come before me <br />on the planning commission; ten to twenty truck loads, double that because the truck loads will <br />become empty trucks at the end of the day or earlier, so let’s imagine maybe 35 to 40 trucks <br />12 <br />EXHIBIT D <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.